Cited by 72Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformancePhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Importance of a Sport-Specific Stimulus for Training Agility

Young, Warren, Farrow, Damian·2013·Strength & Conditioning Journal

Abstract

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO REVIEW RECENT EVIDENCE TO HELP GUIDE THE TRAINING OF AGILITY. AGILITY SKILL USUALLY INVOLVES REACTING TO A STIMULUS BEFORE PERFORMING A MOVEMENT WITH A CHANGE OF DIRECTION OR VELOCITY. RESEARCH HAS SHOWN THAT BETTER PERFORMERS CAN BE DISTINGUISHED FROM LOWER SKILLED ATHLETES BY THE ABILITY TO QUICKLY AND ACCURATELY REACT TO OPPONENT’S MOVEMENTS, BUT NOT TO A GENERIC STIMULUS SUCH AS A FLASHING LIGHT. THEREFORE, TRAINING FOR AGILITY SHOULD INCLUDE A PERCEPTUAL AND DECISION-MAKING COMPONENT INVOLVING REACTING TO MOVEMENTS OF OTHERS, AND THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH EVASIVE DRILLS OR SMALL-SIDED GAMES.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/ssc.0b013e31828b6654

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present study extends literature that ties agility and reaction time to perceptual-cognitive factors and sport-specific stimuli by showing that a brief, structured psychological intervention can enhance these motor outcomes alongside mental-health indicators.

    “The present study extends literature that ties agility and reaction time to perceptual–cognitive factors and sport-specific stimuli [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,68] by showing that a brief, structured psychological intervention can enhance these motor outcomes alongside mental-health indicators.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1976, Manifestations of agility., Can Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreation, 42, 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Young, W., & Farrow, D.
Affiliations
  • Federation University (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
Venue
Strength & Conditioning Journal
Published
2013-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
39-43
ISSN
  • 1073-6840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-1602
OpenAlex
W2333441086
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Strength and conditioning journal (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
agility training, perceptual-cognitive skills, reaction time, decision-making, change of direction, small-sided games, perceptual-cognitive training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review