Cited by 127Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesParental Involvement in EducationFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Grandparent Effects on Educational Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Open access
Anderson, Lewis, Sheppard, Paula, Monden, Christiaan·2018·Sociological Science

Abstract

Are educational outcomes subject to a 'grandparent effect'? We comprehensively and critically review the growing literature on this question. Fifty-eight percent of 69 analyses report that grandparents' (G1) socioeconomic characteristics are associated with children’s (G3) educational outcomes, independently of the characteristics of parents (G2). This is not clearly patterned by study characteristics, except sample size. The median ratio of G2:G1 strength of association with outcomes is 4.1, implying that grandparents matter around a quarter as much as parents for education. On average, 30 percent of the bivariate G1–G3 association remains once G2 information is included. Grandparents appear to be especially important where G2 socioeconomic resources are low, supporting the compensation hypothesis. We further discuss whether particular grandparents matter, the role of assortative mating, and the hypothesis that G1–G3 associations should be stronger where there is (more) G1–G3 contact, for which repeated null findings are reported. We recommend that measures of social origin include information on grandparents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15195/v5.a6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anderson, Sheppard, and Monden (2018) report that estimates of the coefficient βgp tend to be one quarter the size of the coefficient βp.

    “Summarizing the results from 40 different studies, Anderson, Sheppard, and Monden (2018) report that estimates of the coefficient β gp tend to be one quarter the size of the coefficient β p , as is the case for the estimates reported in Figure 3.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Anderson, Sheppard, and Monden (2018)

  • The coefficient on grandparent schooling does not appear to vary systematically with the likelihood of contact between grandparent and grandchild.

    “In their review of the literature, Anderson, Sheppard, and Monden (2018) note that the coefficient β gp does not appear to vary systematically with the likelihood of contact between grandparent and grandchild.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Anderson, Sheppard, and Monden (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, L., Sheppard, P., & Monden, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Sociological Science
Published
2018
Volume
5
Pages
114-142
ISSN
2330-6696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788404057
Cited by
127
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sociological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Nuffield College, University of Oxford
  • H2020 European Research Council (681546)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
educational outcomes, intergenerational transmission, parental socioeconomic status, compensation hypothesis, assortative mating, social background, intergenerational interaction, children's education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review