The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decay Rates of Human Remains in an Arid Environment
Abstract
The environment of southern Arizona with mild winters and hot, dry summers produces great variability in decay rates of human remains. Summer temperatures, which range well over 38°C (100°F), induce rapid bloating as a result of the accumulation of decompositional gases. However, in certain circumstances, the aridity can lead to extensive mummification, allowing preservation of remains for hundreds of years. A retrospective study of 189 cases, concentrating on remains found on the desert floor or in the surrounding mountains and on remains found within closed structures, outlines the time frame and sequences of the decay process. Remains can retain a fresh appearance for a considerable time in the winter, but the onset of marked decomposition is rapid in the summer months. Bloating of the body usually is present two to seven days following death. Following this, within structures, there is frequently rapid decomposition and skeletonization. With outdoor exposure, remains are more likely to pass through a long period of dehydration of outer tissues, mummification, and reduction of desiccated tissue. Exposure of large portions of the skeleton usually does not occur until four to six months after death. Bleaching and exfoliation of bone—the beginning stages of destruction of the skeletal elements—begins at about nine months' exposure. Insect activity, including that of maggot and beetle varieties, may accelerate decomposition, but this process is greatly affected by location of the body, seasonal weather, and accessibility of the soft tissues. Carnivores and other scavengers also are contributing factors, as are clothing or covering of the body, substrate, elevation, and latitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem interval from decomposed human remains
Megyesi, M., Nawrocki, S., & Haskell, N. (2005) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs2004017 · Cited by 697
Simmons, T., Adlam, R. E., & Moffatt, C. (2010) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01206.x · Cited by 241
Decomposition and insect succession of clothed and unclothed carcasses in Western Australia
Voss, S. C., Cook, D. F., & Dadour, I. R. (2011) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.04.018 · Cited by 125
Young, A., Márquez‐Grant, N., Stillman, R., Smith, M. J., & Korstjens, A. H. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12554 · Cited by 71
Reisdorf, A. G., & Wuttke, M. (2012) · Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments · doi:10.1007/s12549-011-0068-y · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Galloway, A., Birkby, W., Jones, A., Henry, T., & Parks, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1989-05-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-616
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W583716916
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decay Rates of Human Remains in an Arid Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs12680j
- The paper
- Galloway, A., Birkby, W., Jones, A., Henry, T., & Parks, B. (1989). Decay Rates of Human Remains in an Arid Environment. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs12680j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.