Cited by 23Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The influence of expectancy persuasion techniques on socially anxious analogue patients' treatment beliefs and therapeutic actions

Ametrano, Rebecca M., Constantino, Michael J., Nalven, Tessa·2017·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct.2017.10.3.187

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The treatment rationale used persuasion techniques proposed to increase outcome expectancy for psychotherapy, including an authoritative speaker and emphasis on empirical support.

    “The rationale used persuasion techniques that have been proposed to increase outcome expectancy for psychotherapy, including an authoritative speaker (a University professor and licensed clinical psychologist) and emphasis on empirical support (35).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ametrano, R. M., Constantino, M. J., & Nalven, T.
Affiliations
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2017-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
187-205
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126806367
Cited by
23
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
treatment outcome expectations, social anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment rationale, exposure therapy, treatment motivation, therapeutic action, clinician beliefs, anxiety symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review