Cited by 41Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Personal Narratives of Illness in Schizophrenia: Associations with Neurocognition and Symptoms

Lysaker, Paul H., France, Christopher M., Hunter, Nicole L., Davis, Louanne W.·2005·Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding whether unawareness/denial of illness in schizophrenia results from neurocognitive deficits or a rejection of stigmatized social roles. One possibility is that some elements of a narrative of mental illness are primarily a matter of personal/social construction while others may be uniquely curtailed by neurocognitive deficits. Accordingly, we gathered narratives of illness among 52 persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders using a semi-structured interview. Ratings of the plausibility, adequacy of detail, and temporal conceptual organization of each narrative were correlated with assessments of neurocognition, symptoms, and traditional insight measures. Degree of plausibility was significantly related to performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a measure of executive function and levels of Positive symptoms on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). When entered into a regression to predict plausibility, positive symptoms and WCST performance made unique contributions (R2 = .51, p < .0001). Higher levels of Positive symptoms were associated with poorer temporal conceptual organization within narratives. Adequacy of detail within narratives of illness was related to traditional insight measures but not neurocognition or symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.140

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lysaker, P. H., France, C. M., Hunter, N. L., & Davis, L. W.
Affiliations
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
  • Cleveland State University (US)
Venue
Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Published
2005-06
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
140-151
ISSN
0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171837362
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
schizophrenia, illness narratives, disease awareness, insight, neurocognitive function, executive function, positive symptoms, narrative plausibility, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, social construction of illness
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Awareness, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Schizophrenia, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review