The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical levels of perceived social support associated with student adjustment.
Abstract
The primary goals of this study were to (a) investigate the relationships among students’ perceived social support and a wide range of academic, behavioral, and social indicators; and (b) determine critical levels of perceived social support associated with these academic, behavioral, and social indicators. This study consisted of data from a total of 1,711 students (n = 856 males and n = 855 females) in Grades 3 through 12 from seven states. The primary instruments used to collect data were the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (Malecki, Demaray, Elliott, & Nolten, 1999), the Social Skills Rating System (Gresham & Elliott, 1990), the Student Self-Concept Scale (Gresham, Elliott, & EvansFernandez, 1993), and the Behavior Assessment System for Children (Reynolds & Kamphaus, 1998). Significant, positive relationships among perceived social support and a variety of positive indicators (e.g., social skills, self-concept, and adaptive skills) were found. In addition, significant, negative relationships among perceived social support and a variety of problematic behavioral indicators (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) were found. Students were categorized as having low (bottom 25%), average (middle 50%), and high (top 25%) levels of perceived social support. Students with low perceived support obtained significantly higher scores on problematic behavior indicators (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) and significantly lower scores on positive behavior indicators (e.g., teacher-reported social skills, self-concept, adaptive skills) than students with average or high perceived support. Only student-rated social skills and selfconcept were significantly higher for the high versus the average level of perceived support. These results are followed by a discussion of the importance of varying levels (low, average, high) of perceived social support in students’ lives. Implications of the findings of this study for school psychologists are discussed. The main goals of the current study were to (a) investigate the relationships among perceived social support and a broad-range of academic, behavioral, and social indicators that are important to the overall adjustment of students in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213 · Cited by 5,436
Cited by
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000058 · Cited by 946
Self-citationRueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6 · Cited by 591
Self-citationPea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., Nass, M., Simha, A., Stillerman, B., Yang, S., et al. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027030 · Cited by 375
Moses, T. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.022 · Cited by 314
Hein, V., Koka, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.003 · Cited by 163
Madill, R. A., Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2014.12087456 · Cited by 67
Life course pathways to prenatal maternal stress
Kingston, D., Sword, W., Krueger, P., Hanna, S., & Markle‐Reid, M. (2012) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01381.x · Cited by 26
Liu, G., Pan, Y., Ma, Y., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105318807962 · Cited by 21
Heredia, D., Sanchéz Gonzalez, M. L., Rosner, C. M., He, X., Castillo, L. G., & Ojeda, L. (2017) · Journal of Latinos and Education · doi:10.1080/15348431.2016.1257428 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K.
- Venue
- School Psychology Quarterly
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-241
- ISSN
- 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1560
- OpenAlex
- W2099122370
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.