Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical levels of perceived social support associated with student adjustment.

Demaray, Michelle Kilpatrick, Malecki, Christine Kerres·2002·School Psychology Quarterly

Abstract

The primary goals of this study were to (a) investigate the relationships among students’ perceived social support and a wide range of academic, behavioral, and social indicators; and (b) determine critical levels of perceived social support associated with these academic, behavioral, and social indicators. This study consisted of data from a total of 1,711 students (n = 856 males and n = 855 females) in Grades 3 through 12 from seven states. The primary instruments used to collect data were the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (Malecki, Demaray, Elliott, & Nolten, 1999), the Social Skills Rating System (Gresham & Elliott, 1990), the Student Self-Concept Scale (Gresham, Elliott, & EvansFernandez, 1993), and the Behavior Assessment System for Children (Reynolds & Kamphaus, 1998). Significant, positive relationships among perceived social support and a variety of positive indicators (e.g., social skills, self-concept, and adaptive skills) were found. In addition, significant, negative relationships among perceived social support and a variety of problematic behavioral indicators (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) were found. Students were categorized as having low (bottom 25%), average (middle 50%), and high (top 25%) levels of perceived social support. Students with low perceived support obtained significantly higher scores on problematic behavior indicators (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) and significantly lower scores on positive behavior indicators (e.g., teacher-reported social skills, self-concept, adaptive skills) than students with average or high perceived support. Only student-rated social skills and selfconcept were significantly higher for the high versus the average level of perceived support. These results are followed by a discussion of the importance of varying levels (low, average, high) of perceived social support in students’ lives. Implications of the findings of this study for school psychologists are discussed. The main goals of the current study were to (a) investigate the relationships among perceived social support and a broad-range of academic, behavioral, and social indicators that are important to the overall adjustment of students in

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/scpq.17.3.213.20883

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K.
Venue
School Psychology Quarterly
Published
2002
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
213-241
ISSN
  • 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1560
OpenAlex
W2099122370
Cited by
286
References
2
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.