Cited by 207Behavioral Health and InterventionsFree Will and AgencyPsychology of Social Influence

Responding to Subliminal Cues: Do If-Then Plans Facilitate Action Preparation and Initiation without Conscious Intent?

Bayer, Ute C., Achtziger, Anja, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Moskowitz, Gordon B.·2009·Social Cognition

Abstract

Forming implementation intentions (“If I encounter cue X, then I will perform behavior Y!”) is postulated to trigger action initiation without further conscious intent once the specified cue is encountered (Gollwitzer, 1999). In two experiments using an injustice paradigm or a categorization task, critical situations (specified in the if-component) were subliminally presented and it was tested whether these situations influenced the preparation (Study 1) and initiation (Study 2) of the planned goal-directed behavior (specified in the then-component). After the subliminal presentation of the critical situations, implementation intention participants showed stronger action preparation and a faster action initiation, as compared to control participants (Study 1) who had not formed any goal intention at all, and compared to participants (Studies 1 and 2) who had only formed goal intentions. These findings suggest that forming implementation intentions leads to automatic action initiation without further conscious intent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.183

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to this link, the action is executed immediately, efficiently, independent of conscious intent and with reduced controllability.

    “Due to this link, the action is executed immediately, efficiently, independent of conscious intent and with reduced controllability (Bayer et al., 2009; Brandstätter et al., 2001; Gollwitzer & Brandstätter, 1997; Wieber & Sassenberg, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayer, U. C., Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2009-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
183-201
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150542385
Cited by
207
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
implementation intentions, subliminal cues, action preparation, action initiation, automatism, goal-directed behavior, if-then planning, categorization task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review