Cited by 41Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Empirical Support for an Evolutionary Model of Self‐Destructive Motivation

Brown, R. Michael, Brown, Stephanie L., Johnson, Aron, Olsen, Berit, Melver, Kristen, Sullivan, Mark·2009·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

We tested predictions generated from an evolutionary account of self‐destructive motivation in two survey studies of 18–24‐year‐old university students. As hypothesized, hierarchical regressions showed that the positive relationship between perceived burden to family and suicide ideation was amplified for participants with low measured health and romantic relationship satisfaction, and for participants with relatively young mothers. The moderating effect of maternal age was also observed in logistic regressions of suicide attempts. These effects occurred independently of depression, hopelessness, and other relevant extraneous variables. Results have implications for understanding self‐destructive motivation, assessing suicide risk, and preventing suicidal thinking and behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/suli.2009.39.1.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-perceived burdensomeness distinguishes people with a history of suicide attempts from those without and is associated with suicidal ideation.

    “Self-perceptions that one is a burden on others also differentiate between individuals with histories of suicide attempts versus no attempts (Brown, Dahlen, Mills, Rick, & Biblarz, 1999; Van Orden, Lynam, Hollar, & Joiner, 2006) and are also associated with suicidal ideation (Brown, Brown, Johnson, Olsen, Melver, & Sullivan, 2009; de Catanzaro, 1995; Van Orden, Lynam, Hollar, & Joiner, 2006).”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Brown, Brown, Johnson, Olsen, Melver, & Sullivan, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, R. M., Brown, S. L., Johnson, A., Olsen, B., Melver, K., & Sullivan, M.
Affiliations
Pacific Lutheran University (US)
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2157472516
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH065423)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, maternal age, romantic relationship satisfaction, health status, suicide risk assessment, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Emotions, Biological Evolution, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Maternal Age, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Thinking, Logistic Models, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review