The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits
Open accessAbstract
Patients whose deficits were limited to clinically well qualified vestibular disorders have been exposed to a number of altered support surface and visual environments while standing unsupported. A six- degrees-of-freedom platform employing movable support surfaces for each foot and a movable visual surround deprived patients of normal inputs derived from a fixed level support surface and from an immobile surround. Various tests employing EMG, force, and body movement recording identified quantitative changes in the patients' strategy for the relative weighting of proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual inputs. The most dramatic performance deficit of patients was their inability to suppress the influence of visual and proprioceptive inputs appropriately whenever motions of external surface disturbed the orientation information provided by these inputs. Thus, the more mildly afflicted patients experienced instability not so much because of the loss of vestibular inputs directly to posture but because of their inappropriate responses to proprioceptive inputs and vision. Discussion is centered on the role of vestibular input as an internal reference system for orientation about which adaptive changes in proprioceptive and visual inputs are made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes
Lestienne, F., Soechting, J., & Berthoz, A. (1977) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235717 · Cited by 583
Berthoz, A., Pavard, B., & Young, L. R. (1975) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00234916 · Cited by 456
A Heuristic Mathematical Model for the Dynamics of Sensory Conflict and Motion Sickness
Oman, C. M. (1982) · Acta Oto-Laryngologica · doi:10.3109/00016488209108197 · Cited by 329
Cited by
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080071 · Cited by 1,062
Nashner, L. M., Shumway-Cook, A., & Marin, O. (1983) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00238781 · Cited by 396
Self-citationDirection-dependent control of balance during walking and standing
O'Connor, S. M., & Kuo, A. D. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · Cited by 393
Postural stability assessment following concussion: one piece of the puzzle
Guskiewicz, K. M. (2001) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/00042752-200107000-00009 · Cited by 343
Marigold, D. S., & Patla, A. E. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00691.2001 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Nashner, L., Black, F., & Wall, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1982-05-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 536-544
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1641290467
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 146.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.02-05-00536.1982
- The paper
- Nashner, L., Black, F., & Wall, C. (1982). Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.02-05-00536.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.