The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do We Really Need Vision? How Blind People “See” the Actions of Others
Open accessAbstract
Observing and learning actions and behaviors from others, a mechanism crucial for survival and social interaction, engages the mirror neuron system. To determine whether vision is a necessary prerequisite for the human mirror system to develop and function, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare brain activity in congenitally blind individuals during the auditory presentation of hand-executed actions or environmental sounds, and the motor pantomime of manipulation tasks, with that in sighted volunteers, who additionally performed a visual action recognition task. Congenitally blind individuals activated a premotor–temporoparietal cortical network in response to aurally presented actions that overlapped both with mirror system areas found in sighted subjects in response to visually and aurally presented stimuli, and with the brain response elicited by motor pantomime of the same actions. Furthermore, the mirror system cortex showed a significantly greater response to motor familiar than to unfamiliar action sounds in both sighted and blind individuals. Thus, the mirror system in humans can develop in the absence of sight. The results in blind individuals demonstrate that the sound of an action engages the mirror system for action schemas that have not been learned through the visual modality and that this activity is not mediated by visual imagery. These findings indicate that the mirror system is based on supramodal sensory representations of actions and, furthermore, that these abstract representations allow individuals with no visual experience to interact effectively with others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41 · Cited by 3,137
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683
A unifying view of the basis of social cognition
GALLESE, V, KEYSERS, C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002 · Cited by 2,236
Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070311 · Cited by 1,801
Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Iacoboni, M. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1611 · Cited by 1,694
Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition
Keysers, C., Kohler, E., Umilt�, M. A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1603-5 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies
Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004 · Cited by 932
Somatosensation in social perception
Keysers, C., Kaas, J. H., & Gazzola, V. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2833 · Cited by 787
What is so special about embodied simulation?
Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003 · Cited by 684
Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication
Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L., & Keysers, C. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001791107 · Cited by 323
Maidenbaum, S., Abboud, S., & Amedi, A. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.007 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Ricciardi, E., Bonino, D., Sani, L., Vecchi, T., Guazzelli, M., Haxby, J. V., Fadiga, L., & Pietrini, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-08-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 9719-9724
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1981315339
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do We Really Need Vision? How Blind People “See” the Actions of Others. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.0274-09.2009
- The paper
- Ricciardi, E., Bonino, D., Sani, L., Vecchi, T., Guazzelli, M., Haxby, J. V., Fadiga, L., & Pietrini, P. (2009). Do We Really Need Vision? How Blind People “See” the Actions of Others. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0274-09.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.