Cited by 420Action Observation and SynchronizationMultisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music Perception

Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition

Keysers, C., Kohler, E., Umilt�, M. A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.·2003·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Many object-related actions can be recognized both by their sound and by their vision. Here we describe a population of neurons in the ventral premotor cortex of the monkey that discharge both when the animal performs a specific action and when it hears or sees the same action performed by another individual. These 'audiovisual mirror neurons' therefore represent actions independently of whether these actions are performed, heard or seen. The magnitude of auditory and visual responses did not differ significantly in half the neurons. A neurometric analysis revealed that based on the response of these neurons, two actions could be discriminated with 97% accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-003-1603-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The associative account explains why tool-use mirror neurons develop when action performance is reliably predicted by the sight of actions performed with tools, and why audiovisual mirror neurons develop when action performance predicts characteristic action sounds.

    “Equally, the associative account explains in a simple way why 'tool-use' MNs (Ferrari et al., 2005) develop when action performance is reliably predicted by the sight of actions performed with tools (e.g. food items being gripped with pliers), and why 'audiovisual' MNs (Keysers et al., 2003; Kohler et al., 2002) develop when action performance predicts characteristic action sounds (e.g. paper tear”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Keysers et al., 2003

  • Single-unit data show that even when mirror neurons respond to object-directed actions, they have field properties suggesting they were not tuned to do this by genetic evolution.

    “Single-unit data also show that, even when they are responding to object-directed actions, MNs have field properties suggesting that they were not tuned to do this by genetic evolution.”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Keysers et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keysers, C., Kohler, E., Umilt�, M. A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
Keysers, C.
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
153
Issue
4
Pages
628-636
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2066008732
Cited by
420
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Social Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
human action recognition, ventral premotor cortex, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Action Potentials, Animals, Auditory Perception, Macaca nemestrina, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, ROC Curve, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review