The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Pain Responses in Human Infants
Open accessAbstract
Despite the recent increase in our understanding of the development of pain processing, it is still not known whether premature infants are capable of processing pain at a cortical level. In this study, changes in cerebral oxygenation over the somatosensory cortex were measured in response to noxious stimulation using real-time near-infrared spectroscopy in 18 infants aged between 25 and 45 weeks postmenstrual age. The noxious stimuli were heel lances performed for routine blood sampling; no blood tests were performed solely for the purpose of the study. Noxious stimulation produced a clear cortical response, measured as an increase in total hemoglobin concentration [HbT] in the contralateral somatosensory cortex, from 25 weeks (mean Δ[HbT] = 7.74 μmol/L; SE, 1.10). Cortical responses were significantly greater in awake compared with sleeping infants, with a mean difference of 6.63 μmol/L [95% confidence interval (CI) limits: 2.35, 10.91 μmol/L; mean age, 35.2 weeks]. In awake infants, the response in the contralateral somatosensory cortex increased with age (regression coefficient, 0.698 μmol/L/week; 95% CI limits: 0.132, 1.265 μmol/L/week) and the latency decreased with age (regression coefficient, −0.9861 μmol/L/week; 95% CI limits: −1.5361, −0.4361 μmol/L/week; age range, 25–38 weeks). The response was modality specific because no response was detected after non-noxious stimulation of the heel, even when accompanied by reflex withdrawal of the foot. We conclude that noxious information is transmitted to the preterm infant cortex from 25 weeks, highlighting the potential for both higher-level pain processing and pain-induced plasticity in the human brain from a very early age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The development of nociceptive circuits
Fitzgerald, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1701 · Cited by 778
Self-citation
Cited by
Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience
Block, N. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002786 · Cited by 1,146
Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine
Merker, B. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07000891 · Cited by 868
Grunau, R. E., Whitfield, M. F., Petrie-Thomas, J., Synnes, A. R., Cepeda, I. L., Keidar, A., Rogers, M., MacKay, M., Hubber-Richard, P., & Johannesen, D. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.014 · Cited by 502
The development of the subplate and thalamocortical connections in the human foetal brain
Kostović, I., & Judaš, M. (2010) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01811.x · Cited by 462
Williams, M. D., & Lascelles, B. D. X. (2020) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00030 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Slater, R., Cantarella, A., Gallella, S., Worley, A., Boyd, S., Meek, J., & Fitzgerald, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-04-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3662-3666
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2036193957
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical Pain Responses in Human Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.0348-06.2006
- The paper
- Slater, R., Cantarella, A., Gallella, S., Worley, A., Boyd, S., Meek, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2006). Cortical Pain Responses in Human Infants. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0348-06.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.