The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in the cellular distributions of two microtubule-associated proteins, MAP1 and MAP2, in rat brain
Open accessAbstract
The distribution of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) 1 and 2 in rat brain was studied using monoclonal antibodies. Immunochemical staining showed that both MAP1 and MAP2 are present only in neurons and both are highly concentrated in dendrites compared to axons. Otherwise, they differed in distribution in various ways. MAP1 was present at low levels in axons, whereas MAP2 was never detectable in axons with either of two different fixation methods used. In the cerebellum the two MAPs differed in relative concentration in various classes on neurons. Thus, anti-MAP1 staining was strong in Purkinje cells but very faint in granule cells, whereas anti-MAP2 staining was strong in both. There were also distributional differences within the same cell. Thus, in Purkinje cells, anti-MAP1 staining is strong in the cell body, initial axon segment and throughout the dendritic tree, but anti-MAP2 staining is present only in dendrites beyond the initial proximal portion. These results suggest that microtubules with different molecular compositions are present in the cerebellum where they are distributed differently between cells as well as within the same cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The distribution of tau in the mammalian central nervous system.
Binder, L. I., Frankfurter, A., & Rebhun, L. I. (1985) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.101.4.1371 · Cited by 1,588
Sullivan, K. F., & Cleveland, D. W. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.12.4327 · Cited by 400
Caceres, A., Banker, G., & Binder, L. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-03-00714.1986 · Cited by 367
Kowall, N. W., & Kosik, K. S. (1987) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410220514 · Cited by 351
Fukami, S., Watanabe, K., Iwata, N., Haraoka, J., Lu, B., Gerard, N. P., Gerard, C., Fraser, P., Westaway, D., George-Hyslop, P. S., et al. (2002) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/s0168-0102(02)00015-9 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, G., & Matus, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-160
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2156061118
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in the cellular distributions of two microtubule-associated proteins, MAP1 and MAP2, in rat brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.04-01-00151.1984
- The paper
- Huber, G., & Matus, A. (1984). Differences in the cellular distributions of two microtubule-associated proteins, MAP1 and MAP2, in rat brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.04-01-00151.1984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.