The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nicotinic binding in rat brain: autoradiographic comparison of [3H]acetylcholine, [3H]nicotine, and [125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin
Open accessAbstract
Three radioligands have been commonly used to label putative nicotinic cholinoceptors in the mammalian central nervous system: the agonists [3H]nicotine and [3H]acetylcholine ([3H]ACh--in the presence of atropine to block muscarinic receptors), and the snake venom extract, [125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin([125I]BTX), which acts as a nicotinic antagonist at the neuromuscular junction. Binding studies employing brain homogenates indicate that the regional distributions of both [3H]nicotine and [3H]ACh differ from that of [125I]BTX. The possible relationship between brain sites bound by [3H]nicotine and [3H]ACh has not been examined directly. We have used the technique of autoradiography to produce detailed maps of [3H]nicotine, [3H]ACh, and [125I]BTX labeling; near-adjacent tissue sections were compared at many levels of the rat brain. The maps of high affinity agonist labeling are strikingly concordant, with highest densities in the interpeduncular nucleus, most thalamic nuclei, superior colliculus, medial habenula, presubiculum, cerebral cortex (layers I and III/IV), and the substantia nigra pars compacta/ventral tegmental area. The pattern of [125I]BTX binding is strikingly different, the only notable overlap with agonist binding being the cerebral cortex (layer I) and superior colliculus. [125I]BTX binding is also dense in the inferior colliculus, cerebral cortex (layer VI), hypothalamus, and hippocampus, but is virtually absent in thalamus. Various lines of evidence suggest that the high affinity agonist-binding sites in brain correspond to nicotinic cholinergic receptors similar to those found at autonomic ganglia; BTX- binding sites may also serve as receptors for nicotine and are possibly related to neuromuscular nicotinic cholinoceptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McCormick, D. A. (1992) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90012-4 · Cited by 1,117
Abnormal avoidance learning in mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor in the brain
Picciotto, M. R., Zoli, M., Léna, C., Bessis, A., Lallemand, Y., LeNovère, N., Vincent, P., Pich, E. M., Brûlet, P., & Changeux, J.-P. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374065a0 · Cited by 668
Evidence that Tobacco Smoking Increases the Density of (−)‐[3H]Nicotine Binding Sites in Human Brain
Benwell, M. E. M., Balfour, D. J. K., & Anderson, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb10600.x · Cited by 551
Herkenham, M. (1987) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(87)90268-5 · Cited by 520
Neuromodulatory transmitter systems in the cortex and their role in cortical plasticity
Gu, Q. (2002) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00026-x · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, P., Schwartz, R., Paul, S., Pert, C., & Pert, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1985-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1307-1315
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2038995429
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nicotinic binding in rat brain: autoradiographic comparison of [3H]acetylcholine, [3H]nicotine, and [125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-05-01307.1985
- The paper
- Clarke, P., Schwartz, R., Paul, S., Pert, C., & Pert, A. (1985). Nicotinic binding in rat brain: autoradiographic comparison of [3H]acetylcholine, [3H]nicotine, and [125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-05-01307.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.