Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Myelination determines the caliber of dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture

Open access
Windebank, AJ, Wood, P, Bunge, RP, Dyck, PJ·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In order to understand the relationship of supporting cells to the differentiation of neurons in culture, we have used morphometry to study myelination of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons by central or peripheral supporting cells. Dissociated DRG cultures from 15-day rat embryos, free of Schwann cells and fibroblasts, were prepared, and supporting cells were added from spinal cord or DRG; myelination commenced after 2 weeks. Control cultures received no supporting cells. At 7, 14, and 24 days, a total of 22 cultures were processed for electron microscopy. Three fascicles from defined points were sampled from each culture. In cultures containing glial cells, smaller fibers (p less than 0.001) were myelinated (mean of median diameter, 1.13 +/- 0.13 (SD) micron) than in cultures containing Schwann cells (1.67 +/- 0.17 micron), although there was no difference (p greater than 0.1) in the degree of myelination expressed as number of myelin lamellae/fiber. A new finding concerned the relationship of axonal diameter to the presence or absence of myelinating cells. In control cultures without supporting cells or in areas where supporting cells were absent, the range of neurite diameter (0.05 to 1.25 micron) and the median diameter (mean of median, 0.24 +/- 0.03 micron) were similar at different times (7, 14, and 24 days), demonstrating a stable population of neurite diameters throughout the period. In myelinated fascicles, a different distribution of neurite diameters was present. Myelinated neurites had a greater median diameter (measured to inner border of myelin) and a different range of fiber diameters compared to bare neurites. For Schwann cells, this range was 0.7 to 3.4 micron, and the mean of median diameters was 1.67 +/- 0.17 micron; for glial cells, the range was 0.6 to 2.4 micron, and the mean of median diameters 1.13 +/- 0.13 micron. Differences between myelinated and bare fibers were all highly significant (p less than 0.001).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-06-01563.1985

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Windebank, A., Wood, P., Bunge, R., & Dyck, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
1563-1569
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1491939582
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myelination determines the caliber of dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-06-01563.1985
The paper
Windebank, A., Wood, P., Bunge, R., & Dyck, P. (1985). Myelination determines the caliber of dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-06-01563.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.