Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth cone morphology and trajectory in the lumbosacral region of the chick embryo

Open access
Tosney, KW, Landmesser, LT·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We quantitatively analyzed several features of orthogradely labeled peripheral growth cones in the lumbosacral region of the chick embryo. We compared motoneuron growth cones in regions where they appear to express specific directional preferences (the plexus region and regions where muscle nerves diverge from main nerve trunks), which we operationally defined as “decision regions,” to motoneuron growth cones in other pathway regions (the spinal nerve, nerve trunk, and muscle nerve pathways) which we termed, for contrast, “non-decision region.” We found that motoneuron growth cones are larger, more lamellepodial, and have more complex trajectories in decision regions. Sensory growth cone populations, which are thought to be dependent upon motoneurons for outgrowth (Landmesser, L., and M. Honig (1982) Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 8: 929), do not enlarge or become more lamellepodial in motoneuron decision regions, suggesting that this local environment does not affect all species of growth cones equally and that the alterations in motoneuron growth cones in these regions may be relevant to their specific guidance. In addition, the resemblance between the sensory population and other closely fasciculating growth cones lends support to the suggestion that sensory neurons utilize motoneuron neurites as a substratum. We suggest that the convoluted trajectories, enlarged size, and more lamellepodial morphology of motoneuron growth cones in decision regions is either related directly to the presence of specific cues that guide motoneurons or to some aspect of this environment that allows them to respond to specific cues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-09-02345.1985

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Tosney, K., & Landmesser, L.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-09-01
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
2345-2358
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1481475174
Cited by
345
References
35
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth cone morphology and trajectory in the lumbosacral region of the chick embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-09-02345.1985
The paper
Tosney, K., & Landmesser, L. (1985). Growth cone morphology and trajectory in the lumbosacral region of the chick embryo. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-09-02345.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.