The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish
Open accessAbstract
Previous work from our laboratory had shown that goldfish retinal fragments explanted onto a polylysine substratum 1 to 2 weeks following optic nerve crush exhibit a striking clockwise pattern of neuritic outgrowth. In the present study, however, when the basal lamina component laminin was used as a substratum, neurites grew out as uncurved spokes, were less fasciculated, and had an increased rate of elongation. When laminin was combined with polylysine in the substratum, the degree of fasciculation and rate of elongation were similar to those seen on laminin alone, whereas the tendency for clockwise outgrowth was even more pronounced than that observed with polylysine alone. These results suggest that regenerating neurites have an affinity for laminin. Using an antibody to murine Engelbreth-Holm- Swarm sarcoma laminin, which cross-reacted with basal lamina in goldfish tissue sections, we studied the histochemical distribution of laminin in the goldfish visual system. Immunoperoxidase staining for laminin showed a characteristic scalloped pattern of staining in cross- sections of optic nerve bundles. Following optic nerve crush, the reaction product became much more diffuse and intense, especially distal to the crush site. When the retinal ganglion cell bodies were eliminated by removing the eye, the degenerating optic nerve stump still showed the intensive staining. We interpret these results to indicate that optic nerve glia are responsible in large part for the formation of laminin. Taken together, these in vivo and in vitro findings suggest that laminin plays a role in nerve regeneration in the goldfish central nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laminin–a glycoprotein from basement membranes
Timpl, R., Rohde, H., Robey, P. G., Rennard, S. I., Foidart, J. M., & Martin, G. R. (1979) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)83607-4 · Cited by 2,378
Cited by
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Caroni, P., & Schwab, M. E. (1988) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.106.4.1281 · Cited by 874
Interleukin 1 of the central nervous system is produced by ameboid microglia.
Giulian, D., Baker, T. J., Shih, L. C., & Lachman, L. B. (1986) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.164.2.594 · Cited by 859
Extracellular Matrix Molecules And Their Receptors: Functions In Neural Development
Reichardt, L. F., & Tomaselli, K. J. (1991) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002531 · Cited by 750
Schwab, M., & Caroni, P. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-07-02381.1988 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkins, J., Ford-Holevinski, T., McCoy, J., & Agranoff, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1985-11-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3030-3038
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2143441096
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-11-03030.1985
- The paper
- Hopkins, J., Ford-Holevinski, T., McCoy, J., & Agranoff, B. (1985). Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-11-03030.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.