Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish

Open access
Hopkins, JM, Ford-Holevinski, TS, McCoy, JP, Agranoff, BW·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous work from our laboratory had shown that goldfish retinal fragments explanted onto a polylysine substratum 1 to 2 weeks following optic nerve crush exhibit a striking clockwise pattern of neuritic outgrowth. In the present study, however, when the basal lamina component laminin was used as a substratum, neurites grew out as uncurved spokes, were less fasciculated, and had an increased rate of elongation. When laminin was combined with polylysine in the substratum, the degree of fasciculation and rate of elongation were similar to those seen on laminin alone, whereas the tendency for clockwise outgrowth was even more pronounced than that observed with polylysine alone. These results suggest that regenerating neurites have an affinity for laminin. Using an antibody to murine Engelbreth-Holm- Swarm sarcoma laminin, which cross-reacted with basal lamina in goldfish tissue sections, we studied the histochemical distribution of laminin in the goldfish visual system. Immunoperoxidase staining for laminin showed a characteristic scalloped pattern of staining in cross- sections of optic nerve bundles. Following optic nerve crush, the reaction product became much more diffuse and intense, especially distal to the crush site. When the retinal ganglion cell bodies were eliminated by removing the eye, the degenerating optic nerve stump still showed the intensive staining. We interpret these results to indicate that optic nerve glia are responsible in large part for the formation of laminin. Taken together, these in vivo and in vitro findings suggest that laminin plays a role in nerve regeneration in the goldfish central nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-11-03030.1985

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Hopkins, J., Ford-Holevinski, T., McCoy, J., & Agranoff, B.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-11-01
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
3030-3038
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2143441096
Cited by
169
References
1
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-11-03030.1985
The paper
Hopkins, J., Ford-Holevinski, T., McCoy, J., & Agranoff, B. (1985). Laminin and optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-11-03030.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.