Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two cell types in rat substantia nigra zona compacta distinguished by membrane properties and the actions of dopamine and opioids

Open access
Lacey, MG, Mercuri, NB, North, RA·1989·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intracellular recordings were made from 475 rat substantia nigra zona compacta neurons in vitro. The region from which recordings were made was rich in catecholamine fluorescence. Two groups of neuron, termed principal neurons (95% of the total) and secondary neurons (5% of the total) were clearly distinguishable according to one or more of the following 4 electrophysiological properties. Secondary neurons (23 cells) (1) fired spontaneous action potentials at frequencies greater than 10 Hz, or were quiescent (30%); (2) had action potentials less than 1 msec in duration; (3) did not show time-dependent inward rectification with step hyperpolarization; and (4) had slope conductances of about 4 nS (between -75 and -90 mV). In contrast, principal neurons (1) fired spontaneous action potentials in the range 1–8 Hz, or were quiescent (33%); (2) had action potentials greater than 1 msec in duration; (3) showed pronounced time-dependent inward rectification; and (4) had steady-state membrane slope conductances of around 22 nS (between -75 and -90 mV). Secondary cells were not affected by dopamine but were hyperpolarized by baclofen, GABA, and the mu opioid receptor agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-MePhe-Gly-ol (DAGO). On the other hand, dopamine and baclofen inhibited firing and/or hyperpolarized all principal cells tested, but mu or delta opioid receptor agonists had no effect. The properties of these 2 cell types broadly correspond with those described by electrophysiological studies in vivo, in which case the majority, or principal, cells are believed to be dopaminergic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.09-04-01233.1989

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Lacey, M., Mercuri, N., & North, R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1989-04-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
1233-1241
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1764026126
Cited by
406
References
2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two cell types in rat substantia nigra zona compacta distinguished by membrane properties and the actions of dopamine and opioids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.09-04-01233.1989
The paper
Lacey, M., Mercuri, N., & North, R. (1989). Two cell types in rat substantia nigra zona compacta distinguished by membrane properties and the actions of dopamine and opioids. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.09-04-01233.1989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.