The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons?
Open accessAbstract
The ventral tegmental area (VTA) and in particular VTA dopamine (DA) neurons are postulated to play a central role in reward, motivation and drug addiction. However, most evidence implicating VTA DA neurons in these functions is based on indirect electrophysiological characterization, rather than cytochemical identification. These physiological criteria were first established in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), but their validity in the VTA is uncertain. In the current study we found that while 88 ± 2% of SNc neurons labelled by the neuronal marker NeuN were co‐labelled for the catecholamine enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a much smaller percentage (55 ± 2%) of VTA neurons co‐expressed TH. In addition, using in vitro whole‐cell recordings we found that widely accepted physiological criteria for VTA DA neurons, including the hyperpolarization‐activated inwardly rectifying non‐specific cation current (Ih), spike duration, and inhibition by DA D2 receptor agonists, do not reliably predict the DA content of VTA neurons. We could not distinguish DA neurons from other VTA neurons by size, shape, input resistance, Ih size, or spontaneous firing rate. Although the absence of an Ih reliably predicted that a VTA neuron was non‐dopaminergic, and Ih(−) neurons differ from Ih(+) neurons in firing rate, interspike interval (ISI) standard deviation, and ISI skew, no physiological property examined here is both sensitive and selective for DA neurons in the VTA. We conclude that reliable physiological criteria for VTA DA neuron identification have yet to be determined, and that the criteria currently being used are unreliable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 51,963
Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
Schultz, W. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 · Cited by 4,564
Dopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379 · cited 2×
“Email: elyssam@egcrc.net Ventral tegmental area (VTA) neurons are the source of dopamine (DA) projections to the limbic forebrain and have been implicated in attention, memory, reward and motivation (Chudasama & Robbins, 2004; Wise, 2004; Nicola et al. 2005).”
BackgroundPan, L., Gurevich, E. V., & Gurevich, V. V. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m209532200 · Cited by 1,759
Swanson, L. W. (1982) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(82)90145-9 · Cited by 1,718 · cited 18×
“Journal compilation C© 2006 The Physiological Society 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialOpioids excite dopamine neurons by hyperpolarization of local interneurons
Johnson, S., & North, R. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-02-00483.1992 · Cited by 1,637
Modulation of memory fields by dopamine Dl receptors in prefrontal cortex
Williams, G. V., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376572a0 · Cited by 1,593 · cited 1×
“…of behavioural studies that DA plays different roles in each projection target; DA in the NAc is required for responding appropriately to reward predictive cues (Yun et al. 2004), whereas DA in the mPFC plays a role in working memory (Williams & Goldman-Rakic, 1995; Chudasama & Robbins, 2004).”
BackgroundFallon, J. H., & Moore, R. Y. (1978) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901800310 · Cited by 1,169
The dopamine hypothesis of reward: past and current status
Spanagel, R., & Weiss, F. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01447-2 · Cited by 973
Grace, A. A., & Bunney, B. S. (1983) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(83)90135-5 · Cited by 934
Cited by
Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Matsumoto, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.022 · Cited by 2,396
Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area
Cohen, J. Y., Haesler, S., Vong, L., Lowell, B. B., & Uchida, N. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10754 · Cited by 1,318
Ventral tegmental area: cellular heterogeneity, connectivity and behaviour
Morales, M., & Margolis, E. B. (2017) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.165 · Cited by 1,108
Self-citationDrug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: from molecular changes to circuit remodeling
Lüscher, C., & Malenka, R. C. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.017 · Cited by 1,105
Circuit architecture of VTA dopamine neurons revealed by systematic input-output mapping
Beier, K. T., Steinberg, E. E., DeLoach, K. E., Xie, S., Miyamichi, K., Schwarz, L., Gao, X. J., Kremer, E. J., Malenka, R. C., & Luo, L. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.015 · Cited by 1,068
Metadata
- Authors
- Margolis, E. B., Lock, H., Hjelmstad, G. O., & Fields, H. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-07
- Volume
- 577
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 907-924
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2123022860
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069
- The paper
- Margolis, E. B., Lock, H., Hjelmstad, G. O., & Fields, H. L. (2006). The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons? The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.