Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In vivo visualization of pre- and postsynaptic changes during synapse elimination in reinnervated mouse muscle

Open access
Rich, MM, Lichtman, JW·1989·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Using a vital nerve terminal dye (4-Di-2-ASP) and fluorescently tagged alpha-bungarotoxin to stain postsynaptic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors, we viewed the same muscle fibers at multiple times in the sternomastoid muscle of living mice during the process of reinnervation following nerve crush. Soon after axons reenter the muscle, they precisely reoccupy the original endplate sites. However, in contrast to normal adult muscle, during the first several weeks of reinnervation, anatomical and physiological measures show that many of the endplate sites are innervated by more than one axon. Typically, one axon reinnervates the original endplate site by growing up the old Schwann cell tube while another originates as a sprout from a nearby endplate. Within 2 weeks after reinnervation nerve terminal staining shows that most of the sprouts have regressed and physiological evidence of multiple innervation has returned to the normal low level. By repeatedly observing the same endplates during the period of synapse elimination, we could directly view this phenomenon. At some endplates, nerve terminal boutons in one region of the endplate were eliminated at the same time a sprout entering that area regressed. These unoccupied sites seemed permanently eliminated as they are not subsequently occupied by sprouts from the axon remaining at the endplate. We were surprised to find that there is a corresponding permanent loss of ACh receptors within the muscle fiber membrane precisely underneath the eliminated nerve terminals. The decrease in receptors at sites of synapse elimination is due to both a selective loss of ACh receptors already incorporated into these sites and to a lack of insertion of new receptors at the same regions. These sites of pre- and postsynaptic loss, however, maintain cholinesterase staining in the basal lamina for long periods. Control experiments showed that endplates that were permanently denervated, incompletely reoccupied by reinnervating axons, or stained and viewed multiple times in normal muscle do not lose postsynaptic receptor regions. Interestingly, receptors appear to be eliminated before there is any obvious change in the staining of the overlying nerve terminal. Because of the lag between receptor and nerve terminal loss, we could predict which synaptic boutons would be eliminated by looking for lightly stained receptor regions. One interpretation of these data is that the removal or redistribution of relevant postsynaptic molecules by one innervating axon may instigate the elimination of competing terminals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.09-05-01781.1989

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Rich, M., & Lichtman, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1989-05-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1781-1805
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1919911722
Cited by
291
References
0
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo visualization of pre- and postsynaptic changes during synapse elimination in reinnervated mouse muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.09-05-01781.1989
The paper
Rich, M., & Lichtman, J. (1989). In vivo visualization of pre- and postsynaptic changes during synapse elimination in reinnervated mouse muscle. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.09-05-01781.1989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.