The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat
Open accessAbstract
Blindfolded rats were trained to stretch across a gap to palpate rough or smooth surfaces with their mystacial vibrissae. Animals learned to discriminate reliably a smooth surface from a rough surface having shallow (approximately 30 microns) grooves spaced at 90 microns intervals. Field-by-field video analyses confirmed that rats used only their vibrissae to contact the discriminanda. The whiskers swept across the surfaces at 696 degrees/sec during forward movements and 1106 degrees/sec for retracting movements. Mean amplitudes, which were 32 degrees, were considerably smaller than the total arc through which whiskers can move. Rats maintained whisker contact with discriminanda for several hundreds of msec, during which time the animals repetitively swept their vibrissae across the surface at a dominant frequency of 8 Hz. The range extended from 1 to 20 Hz, and the frequencies utilized varied within and among subjects. Whiskers contacted the discriminanda along the hair shaft, not at the whisker tips. The hair shafts were bent continually but to varying degrees as an animal palpated the surface, and more than one of the large caudal whiskers were almost always in contact with it. Thus, whiskers are not used independently as rigid levers. Results indicate that the capacity of the rodent whisker system to distinguish a smooth surface from a rough one is comparable to that of primates using their fingertips and suggest common strategies for active touch in the mammalian somatomotor system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Functional Organization of the Barrel Cortex
Petersen, C. C. H. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.017 · Cited by 732
Feldmeyer, D., Brecht, M., Helmchen, F., Petersen, C. C. H., Poulet, J. F. A., Staiger, J. F., Luhmann, H. J., & Schwarz, C. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.11.002 · Cited by 354
“Two further groups developed early on a paradigm that is based on instrumental learning to test the whisker-related percept (Guic-Robles et al., 1989; Carvell and Simons, 1990; Guic-Robles et al., 1992).”
BackgroundMethodBehaviour-dependent recruitment of long-range projection neurons in somatosensory cortex
Chen, J. L., Carta, S., Soldado-Magraner, J., Schneider, B. L., & Helmchen, F. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12236 · Cited by 334
Balanced Excitation and Inhibition Determine Spike Timing during Frequency Adaptation
Higley, M. J., & Contreras, D. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3506-05.2006 · Cited by 270
Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems
Nelson, M. E., & MacIver, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0099-4 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvell, G., & Simons, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1990-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2638-2648
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2150627463
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02638.1990
- The paper
- Carvell, G., & Simons, D. (1990). Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02638.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.