Cited by 732Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The Functional Organization of the Barrel Cortex

Open access
Petersen, Carl C.H.·2007·Neuron

Abstract

The tactile somatosensory pathway from whisker to cortex in rodents provides a well-defined system for exploring the link between molecular mechanisms, synaptic circuits, and behavior. The primary somatosensory cortex has an exquisite somatotopic map where each individual whisker is represented in a discrete anatomical unit, the "barrel," allowing precise delineation of functional organization, development, and plasticity. Sensory information is actively acquired in awake behaving rodents and processed differently within the barrel map depending upon whisker-related behavior. The prominence of state-dependent cortical sensory processing is likely to be crucial in our understanding of active sensory perception, experience-dependent plasticity and learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.017

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transient networks involving specific interneuron types have been described in deep and superficial layers of the barrel cortex.

    “For example, transient networks involving specific types of interneuron have been described in deep and superficial layers of the barrel cortex, a region of the somatosensory cortex that contains a topographic representation of the whiskers (Petersen, 2007).”

    From Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons (2018) · cites this paper as Petersen, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, C. C. H.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Carl C.H.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
339-355
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100212553
Cited by
732
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 39
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
barrel cortex, somatosensory cortex, somatotopic map, cortical plasticity, experience-dependent plasticity, rodent behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Somatosensory Cortex, Synapses, Vibrissae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review