Cited by 354Neural dynamics and brain functionTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Barrel cortex function

Open access
Feldmeyer, Dirk, Brecht, Michael, Helmchen, Fritjof, Petersen, Carl C.H., Poulet, James F.A., Staiger, Jochen F., Luhmann, Heiko J., Schwarz, Cornelius·2013·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Neocortex, the neuronal structure at the base of the remarkable cognitive skills of mammals, is a layered sheet of neuronal tissue composed of juxtaposed and interconnected columns. A cortical column is considered the basic module of cortical processing present in all cortical areas. It is believed to contain a characteristic microcircuit composed of a few thousand neurons. The high degree of cortical segmentation into vertical columns and horizontal layers is a boon for scientific investigation because it eases the systematic dissection and functional analysis of intrinsic as well as extrinsic connections of the column. In this review we will argue that in order to understand neocortical function one needs to combine a microscopic view, elucidating the workings of the local columnar microcircuits, with a macroscopic view, which keeps track of the linkage of distant cortical modules in different behavioral contexts. We will exemplify this strategy using the model system of vibrissal touch in mice and rats. On the macroscopic level vibrissal touch is an important sense for the subterranean rodents and has been honed by evolution to serve an array of distinct behaviors. Importantly, the vibrissae are moved actively to touch - requiring intricate sensorimotor interactions. Vibrissal touch, therefore, offers ample opportunities to relate different behavioral contexts to specific interactions of distant columns. On the microscopic level, the cortical modules in primary somatosensory cortex process touch inputs at highest magnification and discreteness - each whisker is represented by its own so-called barrel column. The cellular composition, intrinsic connectivity and functional aspects of the barrel column have been studied in great detail. Building on the versatility of genetic tools available in rodents, new, highly selective and flexible cellular and molecular tools to monitor and manipulate neuronal activity have been devised. Researchers have started to combine these with advanced and highly precise behavioral methods, on par with the precision known from monkey preparations. Therefore, the vibrissal touch model system is exquisitely positioned to combine the microscopic with the macroscopic view and promises to be instrumental in our understanding of neocortical function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.11.002

Cites

339 of 339 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most information about whisker contact with objects is relayed through the lemniscal pathway.

    “Most information about whisker contact with objects is relayed through lemniscal pathway (8, 15, 43) (Fig. 5A).”

    From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    Section 2.2 and Fig. 3 describe lemniscal pathways that relay whisker signals to primary somatosensory cortex. They also describe extralemniscal and paralemniscal pathways, and do not establish that the lemniscal pathways carry most information about whisker–object contact. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Furuta, T., Kaneko, T., Deschenes, M., 2009a. Septal neurons in barrel cortex derive their receptive field input from the lemniscal pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 4089-4095.
  2. Ko ¨lbl, C.O., Helmstaedter, M., Lu ¨bke, J.H., Feldmeyer, D., 2010. Fast spiking inhibi- tory neurons in layer 4 of rat barrel cortex. Acta Physiologica (Oxford) 198, 90.
  3. Shi, C.J., Cassell, M.D., 1997. Cortical, thalamic, and amygdaloid projections of rat temporal cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 382, 153-175.
  4. Veinante, P., Jacquin, M., Desche ˆnes M, 2000a. Thalamic projections from the whisker sensitive regions of the spinal trigeminal complex in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 420, 233-240.
  5. Veinante, P., Lavalle ´e, P., Desche ˆnes, M., 2000b. Corticothalamic projections from layer 5 of the vibrissal barrel cortex in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 424, 197-204.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldmeyer, D., Brecht, M., Helmchen, F., Petersen, C. C. H., Poulet, J. F. A., Staiger, J. F., Luhmann, H. J., & Schwarz, C.
Affiliations
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Schwarz, Cornelius
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
103
Pages
3-27
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119610099
Cited by
354
References
338
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 1341)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
barrel cortex, barrel columns, neocortex, whisker representation, primary somatosensory cortex, cortical microcircuits, sensorimotor integration, genetic instruments, rodent behavior, cortical connectivity
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Somatosensory Cortex, Vibrissae, Neocortex, Mice, Rats, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review