The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of facial and rubrospinal neurons to axotomy: changes in mRNA expression for cytoskeletal proteins and GAP-43
Open accessAbstract
Neurons confined within the mammalian CNS usually do not regenerate after axonal injury, while axonal regeneration is the rule in the PNS. It has been hypothesized that this may be related to differences in the microenvironment of the PNS versus CNS and to differences in the neuronal response to injury. In order to test the latter hypothesis, we compared changes in gene expression after axotomy in two populations of neurons: rat facial motoneurons and rat rubrospinal neurons. In situ hybridization with cDNA probes for the medium and light neurofilament protein revealed a reduced mRNA content in both facial and rubrospinal neurons at all times investigated (i.e., 1, 2, and 3 weeks after axotomy). On the other hand, mRNAs for actin and tubulin were increased in both neuronal populations during the first week after axotomy. While this increase was sustained in facial motoneurons for several weeks, total tubulin mRNA and actin mRNA were decreased in rubrospinal neurons at 2 and 3 weeks after axotomy, coincident with their atrophy. The developmentally regulated T alpha 1 tubulin mRNA, which was previously shown to be reexpressed in facial motoneurons after axotomy, was elevated severalfold in axotomized rubrospinal neurons, and increased levels persisted in some rubrospinal neurons as late as 7 weeks after axotomy. Similarly, the developmentally regulated GAP-43 mRNA increased in both axotomized facial and rubrospinal neurons, and increased levels were sustained in some axotomized rubrospinal neurons for at least 7 weeks. The response of rubrospinal neurons to axotomy in the cervical spinal cord is, in the first week, qualitatively similar to the response of facial motoneurons. However, by 2 weeks after axotomy there is a generalized reduction in mRNA levels for all three cytoskeletal proteins that is associated with neuronal atrophy. During this period, mRNA levels for the two specific markers of the growth state, T alpha 1 tubulin and GAP-43, remain elevated. Thus, axotomy of rubrospinal neurons appears to set in motion two independent events. First, an axotomy signal initiates a cell-body reaction similar to that of PNS neurons, including increased mRNA levels for T alpha 1 tubulin and GAP- 43. Later, a generalized cellular atrophy and decrease in mRNA levels occur without reversing the specific responses of T alpha 1 and GAP-43 to axotomy. We conclude that the failure of rubrospinal neurons to regenerate is not due to a failure to initiate gene-expression changes characteristic of regenerating peripheral neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity
Feinberg, A. P., & Vogelstein, B. (1983) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9 · Cited by 24,887
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity
(1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90381-6 · Cited by 4,915
Schnell, L., & Schwab, M. E. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343269a0 · Cited by 1,222
Axonal Growth-Associated Proteins
Skene, J. H. P. (1989) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.001015 · Cited by 1,145
The Axon Reaction: A Review of the Principal Features of Perikaryal Responses to Axon Injury
Lieberman, A. R. (1971) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60183-x · Cited by 1,115
Heumann, R., Korsching, S., Bandtlow, C., & Thoenen, H. (1987) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.104.6.1623 · Cited by 1,022
Axons from CNS neurones regenerate into PNS grafts
Richardson, P. M., McGuinness, U. M., & Aguayo, A. J. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/284264a0 · Cited by 932
Caroni, P., & Schwab, M. E. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90212-7 · Cited by 884
Caroni, P., & Schwab, M. E. (1988) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.106.4.1281 · Cited by 874
Vidal-Sanz, M., Bray, G., Villegas-Perez, M., Thanos, S., & Aguayo, A. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-09-02894.1987 · Cited by 582
Cited by
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Gordon, T. (2016) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-015-0415-1 · Cited by 328
Al-Majed, A. A., Tam, S. L., & Gordon, T. (2004) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1023/b:cemn.0000022770.66463.f7 · Cited by 292
Cytoskeleton dynamics in axon regeneration
Blanquie, O., & Bradke, F. (2018) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.024 · Cited by 189
Deschênes-Furry, J., Bélanger, G., Perrone-Bizzozero, N., & Jasmin, B. J. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m209383200 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Tetzlaff, W., Alexander, S., Miller, F., & Bisby, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1991-08-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2528-2544
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1504340397
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of facial and rubrospinal neurons to axotomy: changes in mRNA expression for cytoskeletal proteins and GAP-43. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.11-08-02528.1991
- The paper
- Tetzlaff, W., Alexander, S., Miller, F., & Bisby, M. (1991). Response of facial and rubrospinal neurons to axotomy: changes in mRNA expression for cytoskeletal proteins and GAP-43. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.11-08-02528.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.