The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor Neuron Regeneration in Adult Zebrafish
Open accessAbstract
The mammalian spinal cord does not regenerate motor neurons that are lost as a result of injury or disease. Here we demonstrate that adult zebrafish, which show functional spinal cord regeneration, are capable of motor neuron regeneration. After a spinal lesion, the ventricular zone shows a widespread increase in proliferation, including slowly proliferating olig2-positive (olig2 + ) ependymo-radial glial progenitor cells. Lineage tracing in olig2:green fluorescent protein transgenic fish indicates that these cells switch from a gliogenic phenotype to motor neuron production. Numbers of undifferentiated small HB9 + and islet-1 + motor neurons, which are double labeled with the proliferation marker 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), are transiently strongly increased in the lesioned spinal cord. Large differentiated motor neurons, which are lost after a lesion, reappear at 6–8 weeks after lesion, and we detected ChAT + /BrdU + motor neurons that were covered by contacts immunopositive for the synaptic marker SV2. These observations suggest that, after a lesion, plasticity of olig2 + progenitor cells may allow them to generate motor neurons, some of which exhibit markers for terminal differentiation and integration into the existing adult spinal circuitry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bernardos, R. L., Barthel, L. K., Meyers, J. R., & Raymond, P. A. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1624-07.2007 · Cited by 647
Grandel, H., Kaslin, J., Ganz, J., Wenzel, I., & Brand, M. (2006) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.040 · Cited by 598
Regeneration of inner retinal neurons after intravitreal injection of ouabain in zebrafish
Fimbel, S. M., Montgomery, J. E., Burket, C. T., & Hyde, D. R. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5317-06.2007 · Cited by 298
Cited by
Injury-induced ctgfa directs glial bridging and spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish
Mokalled, M. H., Patra, C., Dickson, A. L., Endo, T., Stainier, D. Y. R., & Poss, K. D. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2679 · Cited by 280
Localized EMT reprograms glial progenitors to promote spinal cord repair
Klatt Shaw, D., Saraswathy, V. M., Zhou, L., McAdow, A. R., Burris, B., Butka, E., Morris, S. A., Dietmann, S., & Mokalled, M. H. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.01.017 · Cited by 70
Song, J., Dahlberg, E., & El Manira, A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05827-9 · Cited by 64
Kaplan, A. A., Öztürk, G., Bay, S., & Keskin, İ. (2025) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.70031 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimer, M. M., Sörensen, I., Kuscha, V., Frank, R. E., Liu, C., Becker, C. G., & Becker, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-08-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 8510-8516
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2092411481
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor Neuron Regeneration in Adult Zebrafish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1189-08.2008
- The paper
- Reimer, M. M., Sörensen, I., Kuscha, V., Frank, R. E., Liu, C., Becker, C. G., & Becker, T. (2008). Motor Neuron Regeneration in Adult Zebrafish. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1189-08.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.