Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injury-induced ctgfa directs glial bridging and spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish

Mokalled, Mayssa H., Patra, Chinmoy, Dickson, Amy L., Endo, Toyokazu, Stainier, Didier Y. R., Poss, Kenneth D.·2016·Science

Abstract

Spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish: Unlike humans, zebrafish can regenerate their spinal cord. Mokalled et al. identified a growth factor in zebrafish that helps this process (see the Perspective by Williams and He). The protein encoded by ctgfa ( connective tissue growth factor a ) is secreted after injury and encourages glial cells to form a bridge across the spinal lesion. Addition of this protein improved spinal cord repair in injured zebrafish. Science , this issue p. 630 ; see also p. 544

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaf2679

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970127)377:4<577::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  2. 10.1002/dvdy.22438 · DOI
  3. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0758-12.2012 · DOI
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1189-08.2008 · DOI
  5. 10.1089/neu.2011.2059 · DOI
  6. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2120-04.2004 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00930.x · DOI
  8. 10.1186/1746-1596-9-141 · DOI
  9. 10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0319 · DOI
  10. 10.1242/dev.068601 · DOI
  11. 10.1096/fj.04-3217com · DOI
  12. 10.1167/iovs.12-10419 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/glia.22676 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.08.004 · DOI
  15. WhiteB. D.NatheR. J.MarisD. O.NguyenN. K.GoodsonJ. M.MoonR. T.HornerP. J., Beta-catenin signaling increases in proliferating NG2+ progenitors and astrocytes during post-traumatic gliogenesis in the adult brain. Stem Cells 28, 297–307 (2010).19960516 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060182 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00005072-199612000-00005 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1077857 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1862-1_7 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.012 · DOI
  21. 10.1242/dev.129.22.5141 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/ejn.12222 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mokalled, M. H., Patra, C., Dickson, A. L., Endo, T., Stainier, D. Y. R., & Poss, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Department of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-11-04
Volume
354
Issue
6312
Pages
630-634
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
280
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • NIH (T32HL007101, R01 HL081674)
  • Max Planck Society
  • Duke University School of Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review