Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protons selectively induce lasting excitation and sensitization to mechanical stimulation of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro

Open access
Steen, KH, Reeh, PW, Anton, F, Handwerker, HO·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In ischemic and in inflamed tissues, pH levels down to 5.4 have been measured, and this local acidosis may contribute to pain and hyperalgesia in disease states. To evaluate the role of acid pH in nociception, we have studied identified primary afferents in a rat skin- saphenous nerve preparation in vitro where the receptive fields can be superfused at the highly permeable corium side with controlled solutions. The nerve endings were exposed to CO2-saturated synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF;pH 6.1) and to carbogen-gassed SIF phosphate buffered to different acid pH levels (5 min duration, 10 min intervals). Mechanical thresholds were repeatedly tested in a “blind” fashion by von Frey hair stimulation. Low-threshold mechanosensitive A beta- (n = 12) and A delta-fibers (n = 11) were not excited or sensitized by acid pH levels. In 24 of 96 nociceptor type C- and A delta-fibers, irregular low-frequency discharge with poor response characteristics was induced. However, a distinct subpopulation of mechanoheat sensitive, “polymodal” C-units (n = 25; 38%) showed stimulus-related responses increasing with proton concentration and encoding the time course of the pH change. Threshold levels were found to range from pH 6.9 to 6.1; mean maximum discharge was at pH 5.2. All such fibers responded to CO2 as well as to phosphate-buffered solution at the same pH 6.1. The CO2 responses, however, displayed significantly shorter latencies and more pronounced dynamic phases. The carboanhydrase blocker acetazolamide markedly delayed and reduced the CO2 responses. Prolonged application of acid pH (30 min) evoked nonadapting activity irrespective of oxygen supply. Many, but certainly not all, fibers sensitive to protons were also driven by capsaicin (10(- 6) M, 10(-5) M) and vice versa. Repeated or prolonged treatment with low pH induced a significant and lasting decrease of the mechanical (von Frey) thresholds in almost all C-fibers tested (from 35 to 16 mN, on average), and this occurred whether or not a fiber was excited by protons. The sensitizing effect was more pronounced the higher the initial von Frey thresholds (0.75 rank correlation). This sensitization to mechanical stimulation was in contrast to the combined action of other inflammatory mediators, bradykinin, 5-HT, histamine and prostaglandin E2. In conclusion, we suggest that pH sensitivity of nociceptors may be an important source of pain and hyperalgesia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-01-00086.1992

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Steen, K., Reeh, P., Anton, F., & Handwerker, H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
86-95
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1635224753
Cited by
487
References
0
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protons selectively induce lasting excitation and sensitization to mechanical stimulation of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.12-01-00086.1992
The paper
Steen, K., Reeh, P., Anton, F., & Handwerker, H. (1992). Protons selectively induce lasting excitation and sensitization to mechanical stimulation of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.12-01-00086.1992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.