Characterization of the integration time for the stabilization of long- term potentiation in area CA1 of the hippocampus
Open accessAbstract
In area CA1 of the hippocampus, synaptic activation of NMDA receptors during postsynaptic depolarization can generate either a decremental synaptic potentiation termed short-term potentiation (STP) or stable, long-term potentiation (LTP). Examining the relationship between these two forms of synaptic enhancement should provide information about the intracellular processes responsible for the stabilization of LTP. Using the hippocampal slice preparation, initial experiments confirmed that STP can be generated either by a weak tetanus or by pairing a single EPSP with postsynaptic depolarization. Following the generation of submaximal LTP, application of a weak, STP-inducing tetanus resulted in STP (not LTP), suggesting that the processes responsible for stabilizing LTP must be activated during induction and cannot be accessed at later times. To determine the interval over which processes activated during STP can be integrated and result in stable LTP (the “integration time” for the stabilization of LTP), a fixed number of afferent stimuli were given at varying intervals (5–60 sec) during postsynaptic depolarization. Using either extracellular or whole-cell recording, LTP was rarely (11% of experiments) elicited at 1 min intervals and frequently (76% of experiments) elicited at 10 sec intervals. These results indicate that following a single EPSP during postsynaptic depolarization, the processes responsible for the stabilization of LTP decay significantly within approximately 1 min, although this value may depend on the level of activation of the requisite intracellular processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weak repetitive synaptic stimulation can elicit an NMDA-dependent decaying potentiation referred to as short-term potentiation (STP).
“For instance, weak repetitive synaptic stimulation can elicit an NMDA-dependent decaying potentiation referred to as short-term potentiation (STP) (99–101).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Intracellular injections of EGTA block induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation
Lynch, G., Larson, J., Kelso, S., Barrionuevo, G., & Schottler, F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305719a0 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
McNaughton, B. L. (1982) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014110 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Replay of neuronal firing sequences in rat hippocampus during sleep following spatial experience
Skaggs, W. E., & McNaughton, B. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5257.1870 · Cited by 1,173 · see citing works
NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity: multiple forms and mechanisms
Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, R. A. (1993) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(93)90197-t · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Self-citationNicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“For instance, weak repetitive synaptic stimulation can elicit an NMDA-dependent decaying potentiation referred to as short-term potentiation (STP) (99 – 101).”
Background
- Authors
- Colino, A., Huang, Y., & Malenka, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Colino, A
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 180-187
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6575692
- OpenAlex
- W1859494833
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- long-term potentiation, short-term potentiation, integration time, NMDA receptor, postsynaptic depolarization, hippocampal CA1, synaptic plasticity, tetanic stimulation, paired-pulse stimulation, intracellular processes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Membrane Potentials, Rats, Inbred Strains, Synapses, Time Factors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review