Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endogenous NGF and nerve impulses regulate the collateral sprouting of sensory axons in the skin of the adult rat

Open access
Diamond, J, Holmes, M, Coughlin, M·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We have investigated the co-involvement of endogenous NGF and impulses in the collateral sprouting of cutaneous sensory nerves in adult rats, specifically the A delta-axons involved in mechanonociception and the C- fibers that mediate heat nociception. Their collateral sprouting was measured by the progressive expansion, respectively, of the behaviorally defined “pinch” and “heat” fields into surrounding denervated skin (the light-touch A alpha-fibers do not sprout in adult mammals). The expansions of such “isolated” fields were totally prevented in animals injected daily with anti-NGF serum, but developed normally after treatment was discontinued. Light microscopic and EM examination of the skin confirmed that the effect of the anti-NGF treatment was attributable to its prevention of collateral sprouting. Initiation of treatment would also rapidly halt sprouting already in progress. Finally, intradermal injections of purified NGF protein would not only increase the rate of nociceptive fiber sprouting, but also evoke sprouting de novo within normally innervated skin (again, A alpha- axons were unaffected). We conclude that the collateral sprouting of intact nociceptive nerves following partial denervation of skin is entirely dependent on endogenous NGF. The observed latency of this sprouting was 10–12 d; we estimate, however, that at least 2 d of field expansion is required for its reliable detection. Thus, about 8–10 d are required for NGF levels in the skin to rise to effective levels, and for the neurons to respond and initiate sprouting. From indirect findings, the NGF component of this sprouting latency appears to be about 2 d. In accord with earlier findings, the remaining “initiation time” was reduced by 5–6 d if the neurons were briefly excited, even 2 d prior to the isolation of their fields. Unexpectedly, this phenomenon of “precocious sprouting” requires that endogenous NGF be available; the sprouting latency reverted to normal values when the conditioning impulses were evoked during a 2 d anti-NGF “umbrella.” In contrast to the impulse-sensitive neuronal mechanisms involved in the initiation of sprouting, those underlying the sprouting rate were unaffected by nerve activity and were entirely dependent on the level of endogenous NGF. We suggest that interactions like that revealed in these studies between a sprouting agent and impulses that seem to prime the neuron's response to it contribute to plasticity within the nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-04-01454.1992

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Diamond, J., Holmes, M., & Coughlin, M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1454-1466
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1661937675
Cited by
347
References
50
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endogenous NGF and nerve impulses regulate the collateral sprouting of sensory axons in the skin of the adult rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.12-04-01454.1992
The paper
Diamond, J., Holmes, M., & Coughlin, M. (1992). Endogenous NGF and nerve impulses regulate the collateral sprouting of sensory axons in the skin of the adult rat. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.12-04-01454.1992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.