Cited by 154Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala, but not the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, block the excitatory effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on the acoustic startle reflex

Open access
Liang, KC, Melia, KR, Campeau, S, Falls, WA, Miserendino, MJ, Davis, M·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) was previously found to produce a long-lasting, dose- dependent (0.1–1.0 microgram) increase in the amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex. The present study sought to determine where in the CNS CRF acts to increase startle. Intracisternal infusion of CRF (0.1–1.0 microgram) increased startle with a time course and magnitude similar to that produced by icv CRF, unlike intrathecal infusion, which produced a small, more rapid enhancement of startle. While lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus had no effect on icv CRF-enhanced startle, bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala significantly attenuated the excitatory effect of icv CRF but had no effect on intrathecal CRF-enhanced startle. Even though lesions of the amygdala blocked icv CRF-enhanced startle, local infusion of CRF into the amygdala did not significantly elevate startle. The present data indicate that the amygdala is part of the neural circuitry required for icv CRF to elevate startle, but does not appear to be the primary receptor area where CRF acts. The involvement of the amygdala in icv CRF-enhanced startle is consistent with the hypothesis that both the amygdala and CRF are critically involved in fear and stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-06-02313.1992

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intracisternal CRF reproduces the i.c.v. effect, intrathecal CRF does not, and PVT lesions do not prevent it.

    “The effects of intra-cerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusions were mimicked by intracisternal (fourth ventricle) but not by intrathecal (in the space around motor neurons in the spinal cord) CRF infusions and were not disrupted by lesions of the PVT”

    From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Liang et al, 1992a

    Experiment 1 reports that intracisternal CRF produced an increase in startle similar to i.c.v. CRF, while intrathecal CRF produced a smaller, more rapid increase—not no effect. The lesion results concern the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), not the PVT named in the citing sentence; those PVN lesions did not alter i.c.v. CRF-enhanced startle. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intra-amygdala CRF infusions, unlike intra-bed nucleus of the stria terminalis CRF infusions, did not increase startle.

    “Liang et al (1992a) had previously shown that intra-amygdala CRF infusions, in contrast to intra-BNST CRF infusions, did not increase startle.”

    From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Liang et al (1992a)

    The local-infusion results (page not provided) report that intra-amygdala CRF did not produce a pronounced increase in startle, although some doses caused small, transient increases. Our copy does not report CRF infusion into the BNST or the claimed contrast with it; its BNST mention concerns incidental lesion damage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Local infusion of CRF into the central amygdala failed to increase startle.

    “local infusion of CRF into the CeA failed to increase startle (Liang et al, 1992a)”
  • Electrolytic lesions of the central amygdala blocked CRF-enhanced startle when CRF was infused intraventricularly.

    “Liang et al (1992a) reported that electrolytic lesions of the CeA blocked CRF-enhanced startle when CRF was infused intraventricularly.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Davis M (1992) The role of the amygdala in conditioned fear. In: The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction (Aggleton J, ed), pp 255-305. New York: Wiley.
  2. Sarter M, Markowitsch HJ (1985) Involvement of the amygdala in learning and memory: a critical review, with emphasis on anatomical relations. Behav Neurosci 99:342-380.
  3. Gray TS (1989) Autonomic neuropeptide connections of the amyg- Swerdlow NR, Geyer MA, Vale WW, Koob GF (1986) Corticotropin- dala. In: Hans Selye symposia on neuroendocrinology and stress (Tache releasing factor potentiates acoustic startle in rats: blockade by chlor- Y, Morley JE, Brown MR, eds), pp 92-106. New York: Springer. diazepoxide. Psychopharmacology 88:147-152.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, K., Melia, K., Campeau, S., Falls, W., Miserendino, M., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-06-01
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
2313-2320
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1922807292
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns018033-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 25642, MH 47840, P01MH025642)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-18033)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
corticotropin-releasing factor, acoustic startle response, central amygdala, paraventricular nucleus, intracerebroventricular infusion, intrathecal infusion, amygdala lesions, fear, stress
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Injections, Spinal, Male, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reflex, Startle, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review