Cited by 77Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

The neural basis of tactile motion perception

Open access
Pei, Yu-Cheng, Bensmaia, Sliman J.·2014·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

The manipulation of objects commonly involves motion between object and skin. In this review, we discuss the neural basis of tactile motion perception and its similarities with its visual counterpart. First, much like in vision, the perception of tactile motion relies on the processing of spatiotemporal patterns of activation across populations of sensory receptors. Second, many neurons in primary somatosensory cortex are highly sensitive to motion direction, and the response properties of these neurons draw strong analogies to those of direction-selective neurons in visual cortex. Third, tactile speed may be encoded in the strength of the response of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents and of a subpopulation of speed-sensitive neurons in cortex. However, both afferent and cortical responses are strongly dependent on texture as well, so it is unclear how texture and speed signals are disambiguated. Fourth, motion signals from multiple fingers must often be integrated during the exploration of objects, but the way these signals are combined is complex and remains to be elucidated. Finally, visual and tactile motion perception interact powerfully, an integration process that is likely mediated by visual association cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00391.2014

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pei, Y.-C., & Bensmaia, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2014-12-15
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
3023-3032
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2320360449
Cited by
77
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 082865, R01NS082865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
primary somatosensory cortex, direction-selective neurons, cutaneous mechanoreceptors, texture, multisensory integration, finger movement, visual-tactile interaction, visual association cortex
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Motion Perception, Neurons, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review