Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pseudorabies virus infection of the rat central nervous system: ultrastructural characterization of viral replication, transport, and pathogenesis

Open access
Card, JP, Rinaman, L, Lynn, RB, Lee, BH, Meade, RP, Miselis, RR, Enquist, LW·1993·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) has been used extensively to map synaptic circuits in the CNS and PNS. A fundamental assumption of these studies is that the virus replicates within synaptically linked populations of neurons and does not spread through the extracellular space or by cell- to-cell fusion. In the present analysis we have used electron microscopy to characterize pathways of viral replication and egress that lead to transneuronal infection of neurons, and to document the non-neuronal response to neuronal infection. Three strains of PRV that differ in virulence were used to infect preganglionic motor neurons in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV). The data demonstrate that viral replication and transneuronal passage occur in a stepwise fashion that utilizes existing cellular processes, and that the non-neuronal response to infection serves to restrict nonspecific spread of virus by isolating severely infected neurons. Specifically, capsids containing viral DNA replicate in the cell nucleus, traverse the endoplasmic reticulum to gain access to the cytoplasm, and acquire a bilaminar membrane envelope from the trans cisternae of the Golgi. The outer leaf of this envelope fuses with the neuron membrane to release virus adjacent to axon terminals that synapse upon the infected cell. A second fusion event involving the viral envelope and the afferent terminal releases the naked capsid into the bouton. Systematic analysis of serial sections demonstrated that release of virus from infected neurons occurs preferentially at sites of afferent contact. Nonspecific diffusion of virus from even the most severely infected cells is restricted by astrocytes and other non-neuronal elements that are mobilized to the site of viral infectivity. The ability of glia and macrophages to restrict spread of virus from necrotic neurons is the product of (1) temporal differences in the mobilization of these cells to the site of infection, (2) differential susceptibility of these cells to PRV infection, and (3) abortive viral replication in cells that are permissive for infection. The findings provide further insight into the intracellular routes of viral assembly and egress and support the contention that transneuronal spread of virus in the brain results from specific passage of virions through synaptically linked neurons rather than through cell fusion or release of virus into the extracellular space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.13-06-02515.1993

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Card, J., Rinaman, L., Lynn, R., Lee, B., Meade, R., Miselis, R., & Enquist, L.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1993-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
2515-2539
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1518447863
Cited by
317
References
0
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudorabies virus infection of the rat central nervous system: ultrastructural characterization of viral replication, transport, and pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.13-06-02515.1993
The paper
Card, J., Rinaman, L., Lynn, R., Lee, B., Meade, R., Miselis, R., & Enquist, L. (1993). Pseudorabies virus infection of the rat central nervous system: ultrastructural characterization of viral replication, transport, and pathogenesis. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.13-06-02515.1993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.