The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CaMKII "Autonomy" Is Required for Initiating But Not for Maintaining Neuronal Long-Term Information Storage
Open accessAbstract
Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) "autonomy" (T286-autophosphorylation-induced Ca(2+)-independent activity) is required for long-term potentiation (LTP) and for learning and memory, as demonstrated by CaMKII T286A mutant mice. The >20-year-old hypothesis that CaMKII stimulation is required for LTP induction, while CaMKII autonomy is required for LTP maintenance was recently supported using the cell-penetrating fusion-peptide inhibitor antCN27. However, we demonstrate here that ant/penetratin fusion to CN27 compromised CaMKII-selectivity, by enhancing a previously unnoticed direct binding of CaM to ant/penetratin. In contrast to antCN27, the improved cell-penetrating inhibitor tatCN21 (5 mum) showed neither CaM binding nor inhibition of basal synaptic transmission. In vitro, tatCN21 inhibited stimulated and autonomous CaMKII activity with equal potency. In rat hippocampal slices, tatCN21 inhibited LTP induction, but not LTP maintenance. Correspondingly, tatCN21 also inhibited learning, but not memory storage or retrieval in a mouse in vivo model. Thus, CaMKII autonomy provides a short-term molecular memory that is important in the signal computation leading to memory formation, but is not required as long-term memory store.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Numerous studies using peptide inhibitors have confirmed the block of LTP (200–203).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [202]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, pharmacological inhibition of CaMKII activity has generally been reported not to affect synaptic responses (198, 200–203, 357, 358).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [202]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, numerous previous studies have failed to reverse established LTP (Refs. 198, 200–203, but see Ref. 357).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [202]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Third, as discussed in sect. 8, concentrations of CaMKII inhibitors that block the induction of LTP failed to affect maintenance (Refs. 198, 200–203, but see Ref. 357).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [202]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bliss, T. V. P., & Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (1973) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010274 · Cited by 7,424
Malenka, R. C., & Bear, M. F. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,968
Long-Term Potentiation--A Decade of Progress?
Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, A. R. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5435.1870 · Cited by 2,729
In Vivo Protein Transduction: Delivery of a Biologically Active Protein into the Mouse
Schwarze, S. R., Ho, A. L., Vocero-Akbani, A. M., & Dowdy, S. F. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5433.1569 · Cited by 2,418
The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory
Lisman, J., Schulman, H., & Cline, H. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn753 · Cited by 1,860
Hayashi, Y., Shi, S.-H., Esteban, J. A., Piccini, A., Poncer, J.-C., & Malinow, R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2262 · Cited by 1,524
Deficient Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation in α-Calcium-Calmodulin Kinase II Mutant Mice
Silva, A. J., Stevens, C. F., Tonegawa, S., & Wang, Y. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1378648 · Cited by 1,472
Self-citationImpaired Spatial Learning in α-Calcium-Calmodulin Kinase II Mutant Mice
Silva, A. J., Paylor, R. E., Wehner, J. M., & Tonegawa, S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1321493 · Cited by 1,366
Self-citationInhibition of Postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII Blocks Induction But Not Expression of LTP
Malinow, R., Schulman, H., & Tsien, R. W. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2549638 · Cited by 1,325
Sensitivity of CaM Kinase II to the Frequency of Ca 2+ Oscillations
De Koninck, P., & Schulman, H. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5348.227 · Cited by 1,269
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation
Lisman, J., Yasuda, R., & Raghavachari, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3192 · Cited by 1,134
The Cell Biology of Synaptic Plasticity
Ho, V. M., Lee, J.-A., & Martin, K. C. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1209236 · Cited by 573
CaMKII: a central molecular organizer of synaptic plasticity, learning and memory
Yasuda, R., Hayashi, Y., & Hell, J. W. (2022) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00624-2 · Cited by 431
CaMKII: Claiming Center Stage in Postsynaptic Function and Organization
Hell, J. W. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.024 · Cited by 364
Long-term potentiation and long-term depression: a clinical perspective
Bliss, T. V. P., & Cooke, S. F. (2011) · Clinics · doi:10.1590/s1807-59322011001300002 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Buard, I., Coultrap, S. J., Freund, R. K., Lee, Y.-S., Dell'Acqua, M. L., Silva, A. J., & Bayer, K. U.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-06-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 8214-8220
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2891520
- OpenAlex
- W2028360365
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of Colorado Denver
- National Institute on Aging (R37AG013622)
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA046934)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS048154, R01NS040701, R01NS052644)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- long-term potentiation, LTP maintenance, learning and memory, calmodulin binding, hippocampus, synaptic transmission
- MeSH terms
- Benzenesulfonamides, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzylamines, Carrier Proteins, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Phosphorylation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Sulfonamides, Viral Fusion Proteins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mice, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2, Cell-Penetrating Peptides, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
