Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Axons regulate the distribution of Schwann cell microtubules

Kidd, G, Andrews, SB, Trapp, BD·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

It is well established that axons regulate Schwann cell phenotype. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether axons influence the arrangement of Schwann cell microtubules (MTs). Using double- labeling immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy, we show that MTs in undifferentiated Schwann cells are nucleated from and attached to a single MT organizing center (MTOC) that is associated with the centrosome. Physical contact with appropriate axons initiates a myelin- forming phenotype that disperses MT minus ends and induces multiple MT- nucleating sites in Schwann cell perinuclear cytoplasm. The axonal signal that initiates myelin breakdown during Wallerian degeneration induces multiple MTOCs and MT bundles in Schwann cell perinuclear cytoplasm and in cytoplasm between degenerating myelin ovoids. These results establish that axons influence Schwann cell MT distribution by regulating the location and number of MT-nucleation sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-00946.1996

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Neurosci., February 1, 1996, 16(3):946-954
  2. J. Neurosci., February 1, 1996, 16(3):946-954
  3. J. Neurosci., February 1, 1996, 76(3):946-954

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kidd, G., Andrews, S., & Trapp, B.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
946-954
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review