The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of the pattern of photoreceptors in the chick retina
Open accessAbstract
The various classes of photoreceptor cells found in vertebrate retinae are organized in specific patterns, which are important for visual function. It is not known how these patterns are achieved during development. The chick retina provides an excellent model system in which to investigate this issue, containing cone opsins red, green, blue, and violet, as well as the rod-specific opsin rhodopsin. In this study, whole-mount in situ hybridization has revealed striking differences among opsins in both spatial and temporal aspects of expression. The long-wavelength cone opsins, red and green, were first detected in a small spot within the area centralis at embryonic day 14 (E14). In contrast, the short-wavelength cone opsins, blue and violet, were not detected until 2 d later and showed domains of expression both within the area centralis and in temporal retina. The first rhodopsin transcripts were seen at E15 in inferior retina. When opsin expression was first detected, there were differences in the localization of RNA within the inner segment of cone photoreceptors, suggesting that morphological differentiation preceded the expression of photopigment molecules. Marked differences in the distribution of rods and cones were also found. Within the area centralis, a circular rod-free zone bisected by a narrow rod-sparse region along the nasal-temporal axis was evident as soon as rhodopsin RNA could be detected. Such specialized regions appear to be set aside soon after photoreceptor cells become postmitotic, as evidenced by a spatially restricted pattern of visinin RNA observed at E7. The onset of particular opsins in restricted regions of the retina suggest an underlying pattern related to visual function in the chick.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia
Troilo, D., Smith, E. L., Nickla, D. L., Ashby, R., Tkatchenko, A. V., Ostrin, L. A., Gawne, T. J., Pardue, M. T., Summers, J. A., Kee, C.-S., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25967 · Cited by 487
The chicken RaxL gene plays a role in the initiation of photoreceptor differentiation
Chen, C.-M. A., & Cepko, C. L. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00114 · Cited by 293
Self-citationGaly, A., Néron, B., Planque, N., Saule, S., & Eychène, A. (2002) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0736 · Cited by 87
Prinsen, C. F. M., Szerencsei, R. T., & Schnetkamp, P. P. M. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-04-01424.2000 · Cited by 87
“Using whole-mount in situ hybridization, the spatial and temporal aspects of photoreceptor-specific molecules in the chick have been reported (Bruhn and Cepko, 1996): the center of the retina has a rod-free zone (area centralis) and contains all the cone types.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruhn, S., & Cepko, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-02-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1430-1439
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1942735643
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of the pattern of photoreceptors in the chick retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-04-01430.1996
- The paper
- Bruhn, S., & Cepko, C. (1996). Development of the pattern of photoreceptors in the chick retina. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-04-01430.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.