Cited by 97Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory Processes and Influences

Hippocampal and neocortical cell assemblies encode memory processes for different types of stimuli in the rat

Open access
Sakurai, Y·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether each of several different memory processes is encoded exclusively by specific single neurons (single-neuron coding) or by overlapped groups of neurons (population coding by cell assembly). Single neuronal activity was recorded from the rat hippocampal formation (CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus) and temporal cortex during the performance of simple auditory, simple visual, and configural auditory-visual discrimination tasks. All the tasks employed the identical apparatus and time parameters and differed only in the type of stimuli to be processed for correct performance. Single neurons showing significantly differential activity among the discriminative stimuli in each task were judged to be task-related and involved in the memory process of the task. Of the total number of neurons recorded from the hippocampal formation and temporal cortex, 21– 26% of the neurons showed task-related activity in only one task, in two tasks, or in all three tasks. This result indicates some overlapping among the neurons involved in each of teh different memory processes. A cross-correlation analysis tested activity correlations among the neurons recorded simultaneously. Most pairs of the hippocampal neurons related to the same tasks (same memory processes) showed correlations during performance of the related tasks. This result showing coactivation of the same types of task-related neurons, together with the result showing the overlapping of task-related neurons, supports the concept of population coding by cell assemblies specifically in the hippocampal formation during memory processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02809.1996

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Place cell activity in rats can encode information about the 'what' and 'when' of events.

    “evidence suggests that place cell activity in rats can also encode information about the ‘what’ (e.g. odours and their status, i.e. match/non-match [124–126]) and ‘when’ (i.e. elapsed time [127,128]) of events.”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Palm G (1982) Neural assemblies-studies of brain functions, Vol 7. New York: Springer.
  2. Sakurai Y (1996) Hippocampal and neocortical neurons involved in simple and configural discriminations in the rat. In: The hippocampus: functions and clinical relevance (Kato N, ed), Amsterdam: Elsevier, in press.
  3. Squire LR (1987) Memory and brain. New York: Oxford UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakurai, Y.
Affiliations
University of Toyama (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakurai, Y
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-04-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
2809-2819
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2103493243
Cited by
97
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampal formation, temporal cortex, cell assemblies, population coding, single-neuron coding, memory processes, auditory discrimination, visual discrimination, CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus, cross correlation function, rats
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination, Psychological, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review