The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemically Mediated Cross-Excitation in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia
Open accessAbstract
Primary afferent neurons in mammalian dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) are anatomically isolated from one another and are not synaptically interconnected. As such, they are classically thought to function as independent sensory communication elements. However, it has recently been shown that most DRG neurons are transiently depolarized when axons of neighboring neurons of the same ganglion are stimulated repetitively. Here we further characterize this functional coupling. In electrophysiological recordings made from excised rat DRGs, we found that DRG “cross-depolarization” is excitatory in that it is accompanied by an increase in the probability of spiking in response to otherwise subthreshold test pulses delivered intracellularly. Cross-depolarization contributes to this mutual cross-excitation. However, at least as important a contribution comes from a net increase in the neurons’ input resistance (Rin) triggered by the stimulation of neighboring neurons. This change in Rin occurs even when cross-depolarization is absent or is balanced out. The amplitude of cross-depolarization was found to be voltage-dependent, with a reversal potential at approximately −23 mV. Reversibility and the change in Rin both indicate that activity of neighboring neurons causes a membrane conductance change that is chemically mediated. Thus, far from being isolated, most DRG neurons participate in ongoing mutual interactions in which neuronal excitability is continuously modulated by afferent spike activity. This intraganglionic dialog appears to be mediated, at least in part, by an activity-dependent diffusable substance(s) released from neuronal somata and/or adjacent axons, and detected by neighboring cell somata and/or axons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Vagal Afferent Innervation of the Airways in Health and Disease
Mazzone, S. B., & Undem, B. J. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00039.2015 · Cited by 552
Pathophysiology of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Ignition Hypothesis
Devor, M., Amir, R., & Rappaport, Z. H. (2002) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002 · Cited by 498
Self-citationLiu, C.-N., Wall, P. D., Ben-Dor, E., Michaelis, M., Amir, R., & Devor, M. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00251-7 · Cited by 444
Self-citationMechanisms of neuropathic pain
Bridges, D., Thompson, S. W. N., & Rice, A. S. C. (2001) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.12 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir, R., & Devor, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4733-4741
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1952350508
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemically Mediated Cross-Excitation in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04733.1996
- The paper
- Amir, R., & Devor, M. (1996). Chemically Mediated Cross-Excitation in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04733.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.