Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Properties of AMPA and NMDA Receptors Expressed in Identified Types of Basal Ganglia Neurons

Open access
Götz, Thomas, Kraushaar, Udo, Geiger, Jörg, Lübke, Joachim, Berger, Thomas, Jonas, Peter·1997·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

AMPA- and NMDA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs and NMDARs) mediate excitatory synaptic transmission in the basal ganglia and may contribute to excitotoxic injury. We investigated the functional properties of AMPARs and NMDARs expressed by six main types of basal ganglia neurons in acute rat brain slices (principal neurons and cholinergic interneurons of striatum, GABAergic and dopaminergic neurons of substantia nigra, globus pallidus neurons, and subthalamic nucleus neurons) using fast application of glutamate to nucleated and outside-out membrane patches. AMPARs in different types of basal ganglia neurons were functionally distinct. Those expressed in striatal principal neurons exhibited the slowest gating (desensitization time constant τ = 11.5 msec, 1 m m glutamate, 22°C), whereas those in striatal cholinergic interneurons showed the fastest gating (desensitization time constant τ = 3.6 msec). The lowest Ca 2+permeability of AMPARs was observed in nigral dopaminergic neurons (PCa/PNa= 0.10), whereas the highest Ca 2+permeability was found in subthalamic nucleus neurons (PCa/PNa= 1.17). NMDARs of different types of basal ganglia neurons were less variable in their functional properties; those expressed in nigral dopaminergic neurons exhibited the slowest gating (deactivation time constant of predominant fast component τ 1= 150 msec, 100 μ m glutamate), and those of globus pallidus neurons showed the fastest gating (τ 1= 67 msec). The Mg 2+block of NMDARs was similar; the average chord conductance ratio g−60mV/g+40mV was 0.18–0.22 in 100 μ m external Mg 2+. Hence, AMPARs expressed in different types of basal ganglia neurons are markedly diverse, whereas NMDARs are less variable in functional properties that are relevant for excitatory synaptic transmission and neuronal vulnerability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.17-01-00204.1997

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Götz, T., Kraushaar, U., Geiger, J., Lübke, J., Berger, T., & Jonas, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
204-215
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1540417297
Cited by
192
References
3
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Properties of AMPA and NMDA Receptors Expressed in Identified Types of Basal Ganglia Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.17-01-00204.1997
The paper
Götz, T., Kraushaar, U., Geiger, J., Lübke, J., Berger, T., & Jonas, P. (1997). Functional Properties of AMPA and NMDA Receptors Expressed in Identified Types of Basal Ganglia Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-01-00204.1997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.