Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Segregation of Different GABAAReceptors to Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Membranes of Cerebellar Granule Cells

Open access
Nusser, Zoltan, Sieghart, Werner, Somogyi, Peter·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Two types of GABA A receptor-mediated inhibition (phasic and tonic) have been described in cerebellar granule cells, although these cells receive GABAergic input only from a single cell type, the Golgi cell. In adult rats, granule cells express six GABA A receptor subunits abundantly (α1, α6, β2, β3, γ2, and δ), which are coassembled into at least four to six distinct GABA A receptor subtypes. We tested whether a differential distribution of GABA A receptors on the surface of granule cells could play a role in the different forms of inhibition, assuming that phasic inhibition originates from the activation of synaptic receptors, whereas tonic inhibition is provided mainly by extrasynaptic receptors. The α1, α6, β2/3, and γ2 subunits have been found by immunogold localizations to be concentrated in GABAergic Golgi synapses and also are present in the extrasynaptic membrane at a lower concentration. In contrast, immunoparticles for the δ subunit could not be detected in synaptic junctions, although they were abundantly present in the extrasynaptic dendritic and somatic membranes. Gold particles for the α6, γ2, and β2/3, but not the α1 and δ, subunits also were concentrated in some glutamatergic mossy fiber synapses, where their colocalization with AMPA-type glutamate receptors was demonstrated. The exclusive extrasynaptic presence of the δ subunit-containing receptors, together with their kinetic properties, suggests that tonic inhibition could be mediated mainly by extrasynaptic α 6 β 2/3 δ receptors, whereas phasic inhibition is attributable to the activation of synaptic α 1 β 2/3 γ 2, α 6 β 2/3 γ 2, and α 1 α 6 β 2/3 γ 2 receptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-05-01693.1998

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Nusser, Z., Sieghart, W., & Somogyi, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
1693-1703
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2135382901
Cited by
833
References
6
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segregation of Different GABAAReceptors to Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Membranes of Cerebellar Granule Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-05-01693.1998
The paper
Nusser, Z., Sieghart, W., & Somogyi, P. (1998). Segregation of Different GABAAReceptors to Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Membranes of Cerebellar Granule Cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-05-01693.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.