The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age-Related Alteration in Processing of Temporal Sound Features in the Auditory Midbrain of the CBA Mouse
Open accessAbstract
The perception of complex sounds, such as speech and animal vocalizations, requires the central auditory system to analyze rapid, ongoing fluctuations in sound frequency and intensity. A decline in temporal acuity has been identified as one component of age-related hearing loss. The detection of short, silent gaps is thought to reflect an important fundamental dimension of temporal resolution. In this study we compared the neural response elicited by silent gaps imbedded in noise of single neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of young and old CBA mice. IC neurons were classified by their temporal discharge patterns. Phasic units, which accounted for the majority of response types encountered, tended to have the shortest minimal gap thresholds (MGTs), regardless of age. We report three age-related changes in neural processing of silent gaps. First, although the shortest MGTs (1–2 msec) were observed in phasic units from both young and old animals, the number of neurons exhibiting the shortest MGTs was much lower in old mice, regardless of the presentation level. Second, in the majority of phasic units, recovery of response to the stimulus after the silent gap was of a lower magnitude and much slower in units from old mice. Finally, the neuronal map representing response latency versus best frequency was found to be altered in the old IC. These results demonstrate a central auditory system correlate for age-related decline in temporal processing at the level of the auditory midbrain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Willott, J. F. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.391 · Cited by 211 · cited 3×
“Comparison between the best young and best old thresholds reveals an age-related threshold shift of ;20–30 dB across frequency, a finding that has been reported previously in both evoked potential and single-unit studies of the rodent IC (Willott, 1986; Li and Borg, 1992; Finlayson and Caspary, 1993).”
Background
Cited by
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Syka, J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2002 · Cited by 369
Improved cortical entrainment to infant communication calls in mothers compared with virgin mice
Liu, R. C., Linden, J. F., & Schreiner, C. E. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x · Cited by 112
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Benson, N. J., Hamstra, S. J., & Storzer, E. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2149837 · Cited by 90
Parvalbumin immunoreactivity in the auditory cortex of a mouse model of presbycusis.
Martin del Campo, H. N., Measor, K. R., & Razak, K. A. (2012) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.017 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Walton, J. P., Frisina, R. D., & O’Neill, W. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2764-2776
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1936698238
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age-Related Alteration in Processing of Temporal Sound Features in the Auditory Midbrain of the CBA Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02764.1998
- The paper
- Walton, J. P., Frisina, R. D., & O’Neill, W. E. (1998). Age-Related Alteration in Processing of Temporal Sound Features in the Auditory Midbrain of the CBA Mouse. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02764.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.