Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrophysiology of the Hippocampal and Amygdaloid Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat: Convergence, Segregation, and Interaction of Inputs

Open access
Mulder, Antonius B., Hodenpijl, Martijn Gijsberti, Lopes da Silva, Fernando H.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (Nacb) receives inputs from hippocampus and amygdala but it is still unclear how these inputs are functionally organized and may interact. The interplay between these input pathways was examined using electrophysiological tools in the rat,in vivo, under halothane anesthesia. After fornix/fimbria stimulation (Fo/Fi, subicular projection fibers to the Nacb), mono- and polysynaptically driven single units were recorded in the medial shell/core regions of the Nacb and in the ventromedial caudate putamen. Monosynaptically driven neurons by basolateral amygdala (BLA) stimulation were found in the medial shell/core and in the ventrolateral shell/core regions. In the areas of convergence (medial shell/core), paired activation of BLA followed by that of Fo/Fi resulted in an enhancement of the Fo/Fi response, whereas stimulation in the reverse order, Fo/Fi followed by BLA, led to a depression of the BLA response. In addition to these patterns of interactions, the tetanization of the Fo/Fi to Nacb pathway caused a homosynaptic decremental (long-term) potentiation in the Nacb, accompanied by a heterosynaptic (long-term) depression of the nontetanized BLA to Nacb pathway. We postulate that the hippocampal inputs may close a “gate” for the amygdala inputs, whereas the gate is opened for the hippocampus inputs by previous amygdalar activity. These opposite effects on the Nacb neuronal populations should be taken into account when interpreting behavioral phenomena, particularly with respect to the contrasting effects of the amygdala and the hippocampus in locomotion and place learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-13-05095.1998

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Mulder, A. B., Hodenpijl, M. G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
18
Issue
13
Pages
5095-5102
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1897360186
Cited by
174
References
7
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiology of the Hippocampal and Amygdaloid Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat: Convergence, Segregation, and Interaction of Inputs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-13-05095.1998
The paper
Mulder, A. B., Hodenpijl, M. G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1998). Electrophysiology of the Hippocampal and Amygdaloid Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat: Convergence, Segregation, and Interaction of Inputs. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-13-05095.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.