Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between Fos Production and Classical Fear Conditioning: Effects of Novelty, Latent Inhibition, and Unconditioned Stimulus Preexposure

Open access
Radulovic, Jelena, Kammermeier, Jens, Spiess, Joachim·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The relationship between FOS production in the sensory cortex and limbic system and the ability of C57BL/6N mice to acquire context- and tone-dependent freezing were investigated after fear conditioning, which was achieved by exposure of mice to context only or context and tone (10 kHz, 75 dB) as conditioned stimuli (Cs) paired with an electric footshock (0.7 mA, constant) as unconditioned stimulus (Us). The effect of preexposure to Cs or Cs paired with Us on FOS production and learning was also tested. It was demonstrated that high simultaneous FOS production in the parietal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala paralleled the ability of mice to acquire strong freezing responses to novel Cs. After contextual preexposure (latent inhibition), FOS production could be elicited in the central amygdala only by shock and in the basolateral amygdala only by tone. Under these conditions, the ability of mice to acquire contextual freezing was almost abolished, whereas tone-dependent freezing was reduced. Lacking FOS production in the central amygdala after preexposure to context followed by shock (Us preexposure effect) paralleled the inability of mice to acquire tone-dependent freezing, although the tone elicited FOS production in the basolateral amygdala. On the basis of these findings it was concluded that synchronous Cs- and Us-induced FOS production in several defined forebrain areas was accompanied with associative learning of novel stimuli, and that a subsequent low level of FOS production might have been responsible or indicative for delayed conditioning to those stimuli.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07452.1998

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Radulovic, J., Kammermeier, J., & Spiess, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-09-15
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
7452-7461
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1562926869
Cited by
248
References
6
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between Fos Production and Classical Fear Conditioning: Effects of Novelty, Latent Inhibition, and Unconditioned Stimulus Preexposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07452.1998
The paper
Radulovic, J., Kammermeier, J., & Spiess, J. (1998). Relationship between Fos Production and Classical Fear Conditioning: Effects of Novelty, Latent Inhibition, and Unconditioned Stimulus Preexposure. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07452.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.