Cited by 1,215Motor Control and AdaptationRobot Manipulation and LearningEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use

Open access
Santello, Marco, Flanders, Martha, Soechting, John F.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Subjects were asked to shape the right hand as if to grasp and use a large number of familiar objects. The chosen objects typically are held with a variety of grips, including “precision” and “power” grips. Static hand posture was measured by recording the angular position of 15 joint angles of the fingers and of the thumb. Although subjects adopted distinct hand shapes for the various objects, the joint angles of the digits did not vary independently. Principal components analysis showed that the first two components could account for >80% of the variance, implying a substantial reduction from the 15 degrees of freedom that were recorded. However, even though they were small, higher-order (more than three) principal components did not represent random variability but instead provided additional information about the object. These results suggest that the control of hand posture involves a few postural synergies, regulating the general shape of the hand, coupled with a finer control mechanism providing for small, subtle adjustments. Because the postural synergies did not coincide with grip taxonomies, the results suggest that hand posture may be regulated independently from the control of the contact forces that are used to grasp an object.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-23-10105.1998

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For multifingered hands, human control uses low-dimensional synergies rather than independent joints, so operators cannot intentionally control more than 20 coupled degrees of freedom through a retargeting layer they cannot perceive.

    “human hand control is organized in low-dimensional synergies rather than independent joints, so operators cannot deliberately steer 20+ coupled degrees of freedom through a retargeting layer they cannot perceive (Santello et al., 1998;Li et al., 2026)”

    From Dexterous Robot Manipulation from Human Demonstrations via Contact-Anchored Retargeting and Residual Policy Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Santello et al., 1998

    In “How many effective degrees of freedom are there?” (page unavailable), the paper reports that two principal components explain over 80% of hand-posture variance, supporting the claim about coordinated, low-dimensional control. But it also finds that higher-order components contribute to hand shape, and the Figure 11 discussion allows for finer control of individual fingers or joints. It does not establish that operators cannot deliberately steer 20-plus degrees of freedom through an imperceptible retargeting layer. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cutkosky MR, Howe RD (1990) Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In: Dextrous robot hands (Venkataraman ST, Iberall T, eds), pp 5-31. New York: Springer.
  2. Iberall T, MacKenzie CL (1990) Opposition space and human prehen- sion. In: Dextrous robot hands (Venkataraman ST, Iberall T, eds), pp 32-54. New York: Springer.
  3. Johnson R A, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical anal- ysis. Englewood C liffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Macpherson JM (1991) How flexible are muscle synergies?. In: Motor control: concepts and issues (Humphrey DR, Freund H-J, eds), pp 33-47. Chichester, UK : Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santello, M., Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
18
Issue
23
Pages
10105-10115
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2154006563
Cited by
1,215
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 64
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-27484, NS-15018, R56NS015018, R01NS027484, R01NS015018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
hand posture, postural synergies, tool use, grasping, precision grip, power grip, finger joint angles, thumb position, degrees of freedom, contact force, motor control
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Feedback, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Movement, Posture, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review