Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron

Open access
Gabbiani, Fabrizio, Krapp, Holger G., Laurent, Gilles·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The lobula giant motion detector (LGMD) in the locust visual system is a wide-field, motion-sensitive neuron that responds vigorously to objects approaching the animal on a collision course. We investigated the computation performed by LGMD when it responds to approaching objects by recording the activity of its postsynaptic target, the descending contralateral motion detector (DCMD). In each animal, peak DCMD activity occurred a fixed delay δ (15 ≤ δ ≤ 35 msec) after the approaching object had reached a specific angular threshold θ thres on the retina (15° ≤ θ thres≤ 40°). θ thres was independent of the size or velocity of the approaching object. This angular threshold computation was quite accurate: the error of LGMD and DCMD in estimating θ thres(3.1–11.9°) corresponds to the angular separation between two and six ommatidia at each edge of the expanding object on the locust retina. It was also resistant to large amplitude changes in background luminosity, contrast, and body temperature. Using several experimentally derived assumptions, the firing rate of LGMD and DCMD could be shown to depend on the product ψ(t − δ) · e−αθ(t−δ), where θ(t) is the angular size subtended by the object during approach, ψ(t) is the angular edge velocity of the object and the constant, and α is related to the angular threshold size [α = 1/tan(θ thres/2)]. Because LGMD appears to receive distinct input projections, respectively motion- and size-sensitive, this result suggests that a multiplication operation is implemented by LGMD. Thus, LGMD might be an ideal model to investigate the biophysical implementation of a multiplication operation by single neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-03-01122.1999

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Gabbiani, F., Krapp, H. G., & Laurent, G.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1122-1141
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2129036096
Cited by
294
References
52
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-03-01122.1999
The paper
Gabbiani, F., Krapp, H. G., & Laurent, G. (1999). Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-03-01122.1999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.