Cited by 49Nerve injury and regenerationRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suppression of Postischemic Hippocampal Nerve Growth Factor Expression by a c-fos Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide

Open access
Cui, Jian-Kun, Hsu, Chung Y., Liu, Philip K.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We examined the uptake and distribution of an antisense phosphorothioated oligodeoxynucleotide (s-ODN) to c-fos, rncfosr 115, infused into the left cerebral ventricle of male Long–Evans rats and the effect of this s-ODN on subsequent Fos, NGF, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and actin expression. To establish the uptake and turnover of s-ODN in the brain, we studied the copurification of the immunoreactivity of biotin with biotinylated s-ODN that was recovered from different regions of the brain. A time-dependent diffusion and the localization of s-ODN were further demonstrated by labeling the 3′-OH terminus of s-ODN in situ with digoxigenin-dUTP using terminal transferase and detection using anti-digoxigenin IgG–FITC. Cellular uptake of the s-ODN was evident in both the hippocampal and cortical regions, consistent with a gradient originating at the ventricular surface. Degradation of the s-ODN was observed beginning 48 hr after delivery. The effectiveness of c-fos antisense s-ODN was demonstrated by its suppression of postischemic Fos expression, which was accompanied by an inhibition of ischemia-induced NGF mRNA expression in the dentate gyrus. Infusion of saline, the sense s-ODN, or a mismatch antisense s-ODN did not suppress Fos expression. That this effect of c-fos antisense s-ODN was specific to NGF was demonstrated by its lack of effect on the postischemic expression of the NT-3 and β-actin genes. Our results demonstrate that c-fos antisense s-ODN blocks selected downstream events and support the contention that postischemic Fos regulates the subsequent expression of the NGF gene and that Fos expression may have a functional component in neuroregeneration after focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-04-01335.1999

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results show an early increase in Ngf transcription followed by its complete recovery 72 h after occlusion.

    “Consistent with the data presented by Cui et al. (1999) and Lindvall et al. (1992), our results also show an early increase in Ngf transcription followed by its complete recovery 72 h after occlusion.”

    From Semax and Pro-Gly-Pro activate the transcription of neurotrophins and their receptor genes after cerebral ischemia (2010) · cites this paper as Cui et al. 1999

    The Results sections report increased postischemic NGF mRNA in the rat hippocampus, supporting the cited comparison to an increase after ischemia. The Experimental cerebral ischemia section describes 90 minutes of reperfusion before tissue collection; the paper does not establish that NGF transcription returned to baseline 72 hours after occlusion. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1682 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/ana.410330508 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90167-T · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF02088834 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00001756-199503270-00024 · DOI
  6. Cirelli, 1995, In vivo antisense approaches to the role of immediate early gene expression in the brain., Regul Pept, 59, 1551, 10.1016/0167-0115(95)00097-U · DOI
  7. Colotta, 1992, Expression and involvement of c-fos and c-jun protooncogenes in programmed cell death induced by growth factor deprivation in lymphoid cell lines., J Biol Chem, 267, 18278, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)36956-X · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90219-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/jnr.490330404 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF02088826 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90164-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9306 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0065-2571(92)90017-T · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.7907431 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01332-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0197-0186(96)00077-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90147-X · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90610-T · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.87.10.3899 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4794 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90559-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.2462278 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.82.21.7330 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/gad.2.5.554 · DOI
  25. Levi, 1988, c-fos antisense RNA blocks expression of c-fos gene in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells., Cell Differ Dev, 25S, 95, 10.1016/0922-3371(88)90105-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.89.2.648 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/BF01233069 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/ana.410360405 · DOI
  29. Macgregor, 1990, Direct cloning of leucine zipper proteins: Jun binds cooperatively to the CRE with CRE-BP1., Oncogene, 5, 451
  30. 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90436-I · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0006-291X(87)80119-5 · DOI
  32. Nishikura, 1987, Antisense RNA of protooncogene c-fos blocks renewed growth of quiescent 3T3 cells., Mol Cell Biol, 7, 637
  33. 10.1126/science.1688328 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90273-3 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12627-6 · DOI
  36. Rosario, 1997, Differentiation of engrafted multipotent neural progenitors towards replacement of missing granule neurons in meander tail cerebellum may help determine the locus of mutant gene action., Development, 124, 4213, 10.1242/dev.124.21.4213 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10232 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/ana.410330503 · DOI
  39. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2060 · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10591 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/BF02088833 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90195-X · DOI
  43. 10.1002/ana.410360405 · DOI
  44. Sharp, 1991, The NMDA receptor mediates cortical induction of fos and fos-related antigens following cortical injury., Exp Neurol, 109, 323, 10.1016/S0014-4886(05)80023-8 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90115-V · DOI
  46. Simonson, 1994, Anti-AP-1 activity of all-trans retinoic acid in glomerular mesangial cells., Am J Physiol, 267, F805
  47. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90048-5 · DOI
  48. Snyder, 1997, Potential of neural “stem-like” cells for gene therapy and repair of the degenerating central nervous system., Adv Neurol, 72, 121
  49. 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90068-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4665 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6454 · DOI
  52. 10.1210/en.137.8.3566 · DOI
  53. Zheng, 1988, Structural and functional analysis of the promoter region of the nerve growth factor gene., Brain Res, 427, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cui, J.-K., Hsu, C. Y., & Liu, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-02-15
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1335-1344
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2156253520
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (NS34810)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns025545-10, 5r01ns028995-10)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-25545, R01NS034810, NS 34810, P01NS032636, NS 28995)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
nerve growth factor, Fos expression, focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, neurotrophin-3, actin, nerve regeneration, gene expression inhibition
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Biotin, Brain Ischemia, Depression, Chemical, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Nerve Growth Factors, Gene Expression, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Genes, fos, In Situ Hybridization, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Neurotrophin 3, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review