Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential c-Fos Expression in Cholinergic, Monoaminergic, and GABAergic Cell Groups of the Pontomesencephalic Tegmentum after Paradoxical Sleep Deprivation and Recovery

Open access
Maloney, Karen J., Mainville, Lynda, Jones, Barbara E.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Multiple lines of evidence indicate that neurons within the pontomesencephalic tegmentum are critically involved in the generation of paradoxical sleep (PS). From single-unit recording studies, evidence suggests that unidentified but “possibly” cholinergic tegmental neurons discharge at higher rates during PS than during slow wave sleep or even waking and would thus play an active role, whereas “presumed” monoaminergic neurons cease firing during PS and would thus play a permissive role in PS generation. In the present study performed on rats, c-Fos immunostaining was used as a reflection of neuronal activity and combined with immunostaining for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), serotonin (Ser), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), or glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) for immunohistochemical identification of active neurons during PS recovery (∼28% of recording time) as compared with PS deprivation (0%) and PS control (∼15%) conditions. With PS recovery, there was a significant increase in ChAT+/c-Fos+ cells, a significant decrease in Ser+/c-Fos+ and TH+/c-Fos+ cells, and a significant increase in GAD+/c-Fos+ cells. Across conditions, the percent PS was correlated positively with tegmental cholinergic c-Fos+ cells, negatively with raphe serotonergic and locus coeruleus noradrenergic c-Fos+ cells, and positively with codistributed and neighboring GABAergic c-Fos+ cells. These results support the hypothesis that cholinergic neurons are active, whereas monoaminergic neurons are inactive during PS. They moreover indicate that GABAergic neurons are active during PS and could thus be responsible for inhibiting neighboring monoaminergic neurons that may be essential in the generation of PS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-08-03057.1999

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Maloney, K. J., Mainville, L., & Jones, B. E.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-04-15
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
3057-3072
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2134887734
Cited by
284
References
5
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential c-Fos Expression in Cholinergic, Monoaminergic, and GABAergic Cell Groups of the Pontomesencephalic Tegmentum after Paradoxical Sleep Deprivation and Recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-08-03057.1999
The paper
Maloney, K. J., Mainville, L., & Jones, B. E. (1999). Differential c-Fos Expression in Cholinergic, Monoaminergic, and GABAergic Cell Groups of the Pontomesencephalic Tegmentum after Paradoxical Sleep Deprivation and Recovery. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-08-03057.1999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.