Cited by 388Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesInsect Pheromone Research and Control

Odor Coding in a Model Olfactory Organ: The Drosophila Maxillary Palp

Open access
de Bruyne, Marien, Clyne, Peter J., Carlson, John R.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Odor coding relies on the activity of different classes of receptor neurons, each with distinct response characteristics. We have examined odor coding in a model olfactory organ, the maxillary palp of Drosophila. This organ contains only 120 olfactory receptor neurons, compartmentalized in sensory hairs called sensilla, and provides an opportunity to characterize all neurons in an entire olfactory organ. Extensive extracellular recordings from single sensilla reveal that the neurons fall into six functional classes. Each of the 60 sensilla houses two neurons, which observe a pairing rule: each sensillum combines neurons of two particular classes, thereby yielding three sensillum types. The sensillum types are intermingled on the surface of the palp, but their distribution is not random. The neurons exhibit diverse response characteristics, providing the basis for an olfactory code. A particular odor can excite one neuron and inhibit another, and a particular neuron can be excited by one odor and inhibited by another. Some excitatory responses continue beyond the end of odor delivery, but responses to most odors terminate abruptly after the end of odor delivery, with some followed by a period of poststimulus quiescence. The specificity of odor response is examined in detail for the neurons of one sensillum, which were found to differ in their relative responses to a homologous series of esters. Adaptation and cross-adaptation are documented, and cross-adaptation experiments demonstrate that the two neurons within one type of sensillum can function independently. The analysis of all neuronal types in this model olfactory organ is discussed in terms of its functional organization and the mechanisms by which it encodes olfactory information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04520.1999

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These olfactory sensory neurons detect specific odorant molecules and convey this information to the brain's antennal lobe, where their signals are further processed.

    “These detect specific odorant molecules 69 and convey this information to the brain's antennal lobe, where their signals are further processed 70 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boeckh J (1967) Inhibition and excitation of single insect olfactory re- ceptors, and their role as a primary sensory code. In: Olfaction and taste (Hayashi T, ed), pp 721-735. Oxford: Pergamon.
  2. Hekmat-Scafe DS, Steinbrecht R A, C arlson JR (1998) Olfactory coding in a compound nose, coexpression of odorant-binding proteins in Dro- sophila. In: Olfaction and taste, Vol X II, An international symposium (Murphy C, ed), pp 311-315. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruyne, M., Clyne, P. J., & Carlson, J. R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
4520-4532
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2114249790
Cited by
388
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC02174, R01DC002174)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
Keywords
odor coding, olfactory sensory neurons, sensilla, olfactory adaptation, cross-adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Male, Models, Anatomic, Odorants, Olfactory Pathways, Sense Organs, Olfactory Receptor Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review