The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adjustable Amplification of Synaptic Input in the Dendrites of Spinal Motoneurons In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
The impact of neuromodulators on active dendritic conductances was investigated by the use of intracellular recording techniques in spinal motoneurons in the adult cat. The well known lack of voltage control of dendritic regions during voltage clamp applied at the soma was used to estimate dendritic amplification of a steady monosynaptic input generated by muscle spindle Ia afferents. In preparations deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital, Ia current either decreased with depolarization or underwent a modest increase at membrane potentials above -40 mV. In unanesthetized decerebrate preparations (which have tonic activity in axons originating in the brainstem and releasing serotonin or norepinephrine), active dendritic currents caused strong amplification of Ia input. In the range of -50 to -40 mV, peak Ia current was over four times as large as that in the pentobarbital-anesthetized preparations. Exogenous administration of a noradrenergic agonist in addition to the tonic activity further enhanced amplification (sixfold increase). Amplification was not seen in preparations with spinal transections. Overall, the dendritic amplification with moderate or strong neuromodulatory drive was estimated to be large enough to allow the motoneurons innervating slow muscle fibers to be driven to their maximum force levels by remarkably small synaptic inputs. In these cells, the main role of synaptic input may be to control the activation of a highly excitable dendritic tree. The neuromodulatory control of synaptic amplification provides motor commands with the potential to adjust the level of amplification to suit the demands of different motor tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dendritic Ih normalizes temporal summation in hippocampal CA1 neurons
Magee, J. C. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/9158 · Cited by 617
Cited by
Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model
Ditunno, J. F., Little, J. W., Tessler, A., & Burns, A. S. (2004) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101603 · Cited by 441
Heckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
Self-citationMotoneuron excitability: The importance of neuromodulatory inputs
Heckman, C. J., Mottram, C., Quinlan, K., Theiss, R., & Schuster, J. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.009 · Cited by 274
Self-citationRole of motoneurons in the generation of muscle spasms after spinal cord injury
Gorassini, M. A. (2004) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh243 · Cited by 256
Nonlinear Input-Output Functions of Motoneurons
Binder, M. D., Powers, R. K., & Heckman, C. J. (2020) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00026.2019 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, R. H., & Heckman, C. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6734-6740
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2122371015
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjustable Amplification of Synaptic Input in the Dendrites of Spinal Motoneurons In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.20-17-06734.2000
- The paper
- Lee, R. H., & Heckman, C. J. (2000). Adjustable Amplification of Synaptic Input in the Dendrites of Spinal Motoneurons In Vivo. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.20-17-06734.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.