Cited by 63Autophagy in Disease and TherapyRetinal Development and DisordersCellular transport and secretion

Autophagy-Dependent Rhodopsin Degradation Prevents Retinal Degeneration in Drosophila

Open access
Midorikawa, Ryosuke, Yamamoto-Hino, Miki, Awano, Wakae, Hinohara, Yoshimi, Suzuki, Emiko, Ueda, Ryu, Goto, Satoshi·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated protective roles for autophagy in various neurodegenerative disorders, including the polyglutamine diseases; however, the role of autophagy in retinal degeneration has remained unclear. Accumulation of activated rhodopsin in some Drosophila mutants leads to retinal degeneration, and although it is known that activated rhodopsin is degraded in endosomal pathways in normal photoreceptor cells, the contribution of autophagy to rhodopsin regulation has remained elusive. This study reveals that activated rhodopsin is degraded by autophagy in collaboration with endosomal pathways to prevent retinal degeneration. Light-dependent retinal degeneration in the Drosophila visual system is caused by the knockdown or mutation of autophagy-essential components, such as autophagy-related protein 7 and 8 (atg-7/atg-8), or genes essential for PE (phosphatidylethanolamine) biogenesis and autophagosome formation, including Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (Psd) and CDP-ethanolamine:diacylglycerol ethanolaminephosphotransferase (Ept). The knockdown of atg-7/8 or Psd/Ept produced an increase in the amount of rhodopsin localized to Rab7-positive late endosomes. This rhodopsin accumulation, followed by retinal degeneration, was suppressed by overexpression of Rab7, which accelerated the endosomal degradation pathway. These results indicate a degree of cross talk between the autophagic and endosomal/lysosomal pathways. Importantly, a reduction in rhodopsin levels rescued Psd knockdown-induced retinal degeneration. Additionally, the Psd knockdown-induced retinal degeneration phenotype was enhanced by Ppt1 inactivation, which causes infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, implying that autophagy plays a significant role in its pathogenesis. Collectively, the current data reveal that autophagy suppresses light-dependent retinal degeneration in collaboration with the endosomal degradation pathway and that rhodopsin is a key substrate for autophagic degradation in this context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2061-10.2010

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on Drosophila have shown that degradation of rhabdomeral membrane also includes classical autophagy.

    “Studies on Drosophila have shown that degradation also includes classical autophagy (Midorikawa et al., 2010).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Midorikawa et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Midorikawa, R., Yamamoto-Hino, M., Awano, W., Hinohara, Y., Suzuki, E., Ueda, R., & Goto, S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Genetics (JP)
Corresponding author
Goto, Satoshi
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-08-11
Volume
30
Issue
32
Pages
10703-10719
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1969890668
Cited by
63
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Genetics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
autophagy, retinal degeneration, Drosophila photoreceptors, endosomal degradation, lysosomal pathway, Rab7, phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, PPT1, infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
MeSH terms
rab7 GTP-Binding Proteins, Animals, Autophagy, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila, Gene Expression Regulation, Larva, Light, Lysosomes, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Endosomes, Retinal Degeneration, Rhodopsin, Thiolester Hydrolases, Time Factors, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Statistics, Nonparametric, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, rab GTP-Binding Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, RNA Interference, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review